Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27655665›Full record

Trial reportOncotarget2017

A phase I-II trial of fludarabine, bendamustine and rituximab (FBR) in previously treated patients with CLL.

Nitin Jain, Kumudha Balakrishnan, Alessandra Ferrajoli, Susan M O'Brien, Jan A Burger, Tapan M Kadia, Jorge E Cortes, Mary L Ayres, Francesco Paolo Tambaro, Michael J Keating and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nitin JainDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Kumudha BalakrishnanDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Alessandra FerrajoliDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Susan M O'BrienThe UCI Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, CA, USA.
Jan A BurgerDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Tapan M KadiaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jorge E CortesDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mary L AyresDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Francesco Paolo TambaroS.S.D. TMO - AORN Santobono-Pausilipon, Napoli, Italy.
Michael J KeatingDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Varsha GandhiDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
William G WierdaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCommunity Cancer Center · USSantobono Children's Hospital · IT

Funding

Tissue CoreP01CA081534 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KIPPS, THOMAS J · 2000 to 2016
$59.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA081534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemoimmunotherapy regimens have been the standard first-line therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). For young, fit patients the standard of care is combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR). Based on the preclinical work demonstrating that bendamustine combined with fludarabine resulted in increased DNA damage, we designed a phase I-II clinical trial with fludarabine, bendamustine, and rituximab (FBR) for patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. Treatment consisted of fludarabine 20 mg/m2 daily x 3 days and rituximab 375-500 mg/m2 x 1 day. Phase I included bendamustine at increasing doses of 20, 30, 40, or 50 mg/m2 daily x 3 days; phase II was with FR, and B at the selected dose. DNA damage response (H2AX phosphorylation) was evaluated in a subset of patients. Fifty-one patients were enrolled. The median age was 62 years; median number of prior therapies was 2; 40% had del(11q); and 41 patients had received prior FCR-based therapies. Hematologic toxicity was more common in ≥40 mg/m2 dose cohorts. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not identified. Bendamustine-elicited H2AX phosphorylation was not dose-dependent, but markedly increased after fludarabine. We identified bendamustine 30 mg/m2 as the safe dose for phase II. The overall response rate (ORR) was 67% with 36% complete response (CR) / CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi). Younger patients (<65 years) had significantly higher ORR (81% vs. 50%; p=0.038). The median progression-free survival was 19 months, and the median overall survival was 52.5 months. FBR is an effective and tolerable CIT regimen for patients with relapsed CLL.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBendamustine HydrochlorideFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRituximabSurvival RateVidarabineBendamustine HydrochloridefludarabineRituximabVidarabinebendamustinechemoimmunotherapyCLLfludarabinerituximab

Identifiers

PMID27655665
PMCPMC5400650
OpenAlexW2519182432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.