Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27655418›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2017

Bone Regeneration Using Gene-Activated Matrices.

Sheetal D'Mello, Keerthi Atluri, Sean M Geary, Liu Hong, Satheesh Elangovan, Aliasger K Salem

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Development of a gene-activated matrix for enhanced AAV gene deliveryFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Comparison ofBiofabrication · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sheetal D'MelloDivision of Pharmaceutics and Translational Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, 115 S. Grand Avenue, S228 PHAR, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA.
Keerthi AtluriDivision of Pharmaceutics and Translational Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, 115 S. Grand Avenue, S228 PHAR, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA.
Sean M GearyDivision of Pharmaceutics and Translational Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, 115 S. Grand Avenue, S228 PHAR, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA.
Liu HongDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA.
Satheesh ElangovanDepartment of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, 801 Newton Road, S464, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA. satheesh-elangovan@uiowa.edu.
Aliasger K SalemDivision of Pharmaceutics and Translational Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, 115 S. Grand Avenue, S228 PHAR, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA. aliasger-salem@uiowa.edu.
Translational Therapeutics (United States) · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Pulmonary Toxicology Facility CoreP30ES005605 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Brandi Janssen · 1990 to 2026
$40.5M
A Novel RNA Based Biomaterial for Bone RegenerationR21DE024206 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ELANGOVAN, SATHEESH · 2015 to 2016
$406k
NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE024206NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene delivery to bone is a potential therapeutic strategy for directed, sustained, and regulated protein expression. Tissue engineering strategies for bone regeneration include delivery of proteins, genes (viral and non-viral-mediated delivery), and/or cells to the bone defect site. In addition, biomimetic scaffolds and scaffolds incorporating bone anabolic agents greatly enhance the bone repair process. Regional gene therapy has the potential of enhancing bone defect healing and bone regeneration by delivering osteogenic genes locally to the osseous lesions, thereby reducing systemic toxicity and the need for using supraphysiological dosages of therapeutic proteins. By implanting gene-activated matrices (GAMs), sustained gene expression and continuous osteogenic protein production in situ can be achieved in a way that stimulates osteogenesis and bone repair within osseous defects. Critical parameters substantially affecting the therapeutic efficacy of gene therapy include the choice of osteogenic transgene(s), selection of non-viral or viral vectors, the wound environment, and the selection of ex vivo and in vivo gene delivery strategies, such as GAMs. It is critical for gene therapy applications that clinically beneficial amounts of proteins are synthesized endogenously within and around the lesion in a sustained manner. It is therefore necessary that reliable and reproducible methods of gene delivery be developed and tested for their efficacy and safety before translating into clinical practice. Practical considerations such as the age, gender, and systemic health of patients and the nature of the disease process also need to be taken into account in order to personalize the treatments and progress towards developing a clinically applicable gene therapy for healing bone defects. This review discusses tissue engineering strategies to regenerate bone with specific focus on non-viral gene delivery systems.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsBone DiseasesBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone RegenerationFibroblast Growth Factor 2Genetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesHumansTissue EngineeringBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Fibroblast Growth Factor 2bone healingcollagen scaffoldgene-activated matrixplasmid DNA and chemically modified RNAtranscript-activated matrix

Identifiers

PMID27655418
PMCPMC5214458
OpenAlexW2498300172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.