ReviewThe AAPS journal2017
Bone Regeneration Using Gene-Activated Matrices.
Review in The AAPS journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunometabolic Modulation of the Bone Marrow Niche by Bioactive Materials to Rescue Impaired Fracture Healing.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Biomaterial-assisted gene therapy for bone repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Development of a gene-activated matrix for enhanced AAV gene deliveryFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Biomaterial-based strategies for osteoporosis treatment and bone regeneration: advances and translational challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Nano Biomaterials in Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering.Current drug delivery · 2026Review
- Research advances in early diagnosis and treatment strategies for peri-implantitis: from microecology to regenerative therapy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Engineering bone tissue with mRNA: from molecular design and delivery to clinical applications.Materials today (Kidlington, England) · 2025Article
- Non-coding RNA modulation in osteoclasts and its implications for osteoblast lineage cell behavior in a co-culture system.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Article
- Article
- Structural DNA nanotechnology at the nexus of next-generation bio-applications: challenges and perspectives.Nanoscale advances · 2024Review
- Novel scaffold platforms for simultaneous induction osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone tissue engineering: a cutting-edge approach.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2023Review
- Women's contribution to stem cell research for osteoarthritis: an opinion paper.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Biomedical applications of three-dimensional bioprinted craniofacial tissue engineering.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Review
- Comparison ofBiofabrication · 2022Article
- A Localized Materials-Based Strategy to Non-Virally Deliver Chondroitinase ABC mRNA Improves Hindlimb Function in a Rat Spinal Cord Injury Model.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Article
- Applications of Ultrasound-Mediated Gene Delivery in Regenerative Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Dok5 regulates proliferation and differentiation of osteoblast via canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2022Article
- Controlled Co-delivery of pPDGF-B and pBMP-2 from intraoperatively bioprinted bone constructs improves the repair of calvarial defects in rats.Biomaterials · 2022Article
- Experimental Rat Model of Bony Defects in the Facet Joint Maintained with Bone Wax for the Study of Spinal Pain.Journal of pain research · 2022Article
- Conductive Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: Current State and Future Outlook.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Gene delivery to bone is a potential therapeutic strategy for directed, sustained, and regulated protein expression. Tissue engineering strategies for bone regeneration include delivery of proteins, genes (viral and non-viral-mediated delivery), and/or cells to the bone defect site. In addition, biomimetic scaffolds and scaffolds incorporating bone anabolic agents greatly enhance the bone repair process. Regional gene therapy has the potential of enhancing bone defect healing and bone regeneration by delivering osteogenic genes locally to the osseous lesions, thereby reducing systemic toxicity and the need for using supraphysiological dosages of therapeutic proteins. By implanting gene-activated matrices (GAMs), sustained gene expression and continuous osteogenic protein production in situ can be achieved in a way that stimulates osteogenesis and bone repair within osseous defects. Critical parameters substantially affecting the therapeutic efficacy of gene therapy include the choice of osteogenic transgene(s), selection of non-viral or viral vectors, the wound environment, and the selection of ex vivo and in vivo gene delivery strategies, such as GAMs. It is critical for gene therapy applications that clinically beneficial amounts of proteins are synthesized endogenously within and around the lesion in a sustained manner. It is therefore necessary that reliable and reproducible methods of gene delivery be developed and tested for their efficacy and safety before translating into clinical practice. Practical considerations such as the age, gender, and systemic health of patients and the nature of the disease process also need to be taken into account in order to personalize the treatments and progress towards developing a clinically applicable gene therapy for healing bone defects. This review discusses tissue engineering strategies to regenerate bone with specific focus on non-viral gene delivery systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.