Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27655224›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2016

Quantifying differences in cell line population dynamics using CellPD.

Edwin F Juarez, Roy Lau, Samuel H Friedman, Ahmadreza Ghaffarizadeh, Edmond Jonckheere, David B Agus, Shannon M Mumenthaler, Paul Macklin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modeling cell population dynamics.In silico biology · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Extinction rates in tumour public goods games.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Progress Towards Computational 3-D Multicellular Systems Biology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edwin F JuarezLawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. juarezro@usc.edu.
Roy LauLawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Samuel H FriedmanLawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ahmadreza GhaffarizadehLawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Edmond JonckheereDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
David B AgusLawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Shannon M MumenthalerLawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Paul MacklinLawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. Paul.Macklin@MathCancer.org.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143907 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HILLIS, WILLIAM DANIEL · 2009 to 2013
$15.2M
(PQB6)An Integrative Computational and Bioengineered Tissue Model of MetastasisR01CA180149 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI AGUS, DAVID B, ATALA, ANTHONY · 2013 to 2016
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA180149NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increased availability of high-throughput datasets has revealed a need for reproducible and accessible analyses which can quantitatively relate molecular changes to phenotypic behavior. Existing tools for quantitative analysis generally require expert knowledge.

resultsCellPD (cell phenotype digitizer) facilitates quantitative phenotype analysis, allowing users to fit mathematical models of cell population dynamics without specialized training. CellPD requires one input (a spreadsheet) and generates multiple outputs including parameter estimation reports, high-quality plots, and minable XML files. We validated CellPD's estimates by comparing it with a previously published tool (cellGrowth) and with Microsoft Excel's built-in functions. CellPD correctly estimates the net growth rate of cell cultures and is more robust to data sparsity than cellGrowth. When we tested CellPD's usability, biologists (without training in computational modeling) ran CellPD correctly on sample data within 30 min. To demonstrate CellPD's ability to aid in the analysis of high throughput data, we created a synthetic high content screening (HCS) data set, where a simulated cell line is exposed to two hypothetical drug compounds at several doses. CellPD correctly estimates the drug-dependent birth, death, and net growth rates. Furthermore, CellPD's estimates quantify and distinguish between the cytostatic and cytotoxic effects of both drugs-analyses that cannot readily be performed with spreadsheet software such as Microsoft Excel or without specialized computational expertise and programming environments.

conclusionsCellPD is an open source tool that can be used by scientists (with or without a background in computational or mathematical modeling) to quantify key aspects of cell phenotypes (such as cell cycle and death parameters). Early applications of CellPD may include drug effect quantification, functional analysis of gene knockout experiments, data quality control, minable big data generation, and integration of biological data with computational models.

Indexed as

Cell population dynamicsComputational modelingGrowth rateMathematical modelsMultiCellDSNet birth rateOpen sourceParameter estimationPhenotype comparisonPhenotype digitizerUser friendly

Identifiers

PMID27655224
PMCPMC5031291
OpenAlexW2521906657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.