ArticleBMC systems biology2016
Quantifying differences in cell line population dynamics using CellPD.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drug-loaded nanoparticles for cancer therapy: A high-throughput multicellular agent-based modeling study.Journal of theoretical biology · 2026Article
- PhysiCell Studio: a graphical tool to make agent-based modeling more accessible.GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2024Article
- Integration of quantitative methods and mathematical approaches for the modeling of cancer cell proliferation dynamics.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2023Review
- Autocrine signaling can explain the emergence of Allee effects in cancer cell populations.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Elucidating tumor-stromal metabolic crosstalk in colorectal cancer through integration of constraint-based models and LC-MS metabolomics.Metabolic engineering · 2022Article
- High-throughput microscopy reveals the impact of multifactorial environmental perturbations on colorectal cancer cell growth.GigaScience · 2021Article
- Inferring time-dependent population growth rates in cell cultures undergoing adaptation.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- FGF2 modulates simultaneously the mode, the rate of division and the growth fraction in cultures of radial glia.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2020Article
- Modeling cell population dynamics.In silico biology · 2019Article
- Mathematical models of tumor cell proliferation: A review of the literature.Expert review of anticancer therapy · 2018Review
- mTORC2 contributes to the metabolic reprogramming in EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor resistant cells in non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer letters · 2018Article
- Extinction rates in tumour public goods games.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017Article
- Discrimination and Characterization of Heterocellular Populations Using Quantitative Imaging Techniques.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017Article
- Progress Towards Computational 3-D Multicellular Systems Biology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe increased availability of high-throughput datasets has revealed a need for reproducible and accessible analyses which can quantitatively relate molecular changes to phenotypic behavior. Existing tools for quantitative analysis generally require expert knowledge.
resultsCellPD (cell phenotype digitizer) facilitates quantitative phenotype analysis, allowing users to fit mathematical models of cell population dynamics without specialized training. CellPD requires one input (a spreadsheet) and generates multiple outputs including parameter estimation reports, high-quality plots, and minable XML files. We validated CellPD's estimates by comparing it with a previously published tool (cellGrowth) and with Microsoft Excel's built-in functions. CellPD correctly estimates the net growth rate of cell cultures and is more robust to data sparsity than cellGrowth. When we tested CellPD's usability, biologists (without training in computational modeling) ran CellPD correctly on sample data within 30 min. To demonstrate CellPD's ability to aid in the analysis of high throughput data, we created a synthetic high content screening (HCS) data set, where a simulated cell line is exposed to two hypothetical drug compounds at several doses. CellPD correctly estimates the drug-dependent birth, death, and net growth rates. Furthermore, CellPD's estimates quantify and distinguish between the cytostatic and cytotoxic effects of both drugs-analyses that cannot readily be performed with spreadsheet software such as Microsoft Excel or without specialized computational expertise and programming environments.
conclusionsCellPD is an open source tool that can be used by scientists (with or without a background in computational or mathematical modeling) to quantify key aspects of cell phenotypes (such as cell cycle and death parameters). Early applications of CellPD may include drug effect quantification, functional analysis of gene knockout experiments, data quality control, minable big data generation, and integration of biological data with computational models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.