Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27655152›Full record

ReviewMycopathologia2017

Equine Pulmonary Cryptococcosis: A Comparative Literature Review and Evaluation of Fluconazole Monotherapy.

C J Secombe, G D Lester, M B Krockenberger

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mycopathologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cryptococcus in Wildlife and Free-Living Mammals.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  5. The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Therapy of Non-Dermatophytic Mycoses in Animals.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C J SecombeCollege of Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia. csecombe@murdoch.edu.au.
G D LesterCollege of Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.
M B KrockenbergerFaculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Murdoch University · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptococcus is the most common fungal respiratory pathogen in Australian horses, manifesting primarily as pulmonary granulomas. Disease severity at presentation is dependent on the athletic use of the horse. The diagnosis and estimation of disease severity are centred around clinical findings, cytological evaluation of respiratory tract secretions, diagnostic imaging, and antigen titre testing. Both the lateral flow assay and the latex cryptococcal antigen titre are used, and important similarities and differences between species are discussed. Cryptococcus gattii occurs with greater frequency than Cryptococcus neoformans in equine pulmonic cryptococcosis and can be successfully treated with enteral fluconazole monotherapy, with disease severity determining treatment length.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntifungal AgentsCryptococcosisCryptococcusFemaleFluconazoleHorse DiseasesHorsesLung Diseases, FungalMaleTreatment OutcomeAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleAntigen titreCryptococcosisCryptococcus gattiiCryptococcus gattii/Cryptococcus neoformans species complexCryptococcus neoformansEquineHorsePulmonic

Identifiers

PMID27655152
OpenAlexW2523098844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.