Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27654622›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2017

How Do Organizational Policies and Practices Affect Return to Work and Work Role Functioning Following a Musculoskeletal Injury?

Benjamin C Amick, Hyunmi Lee, Sheilah Hogg-Johnson, Jeffrey N Katz, Sandra Brouwer, Renée-Louise Franche, Ute Bültmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin C AmickInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada. bamickii@fiu.edu.
Hyunmi LeeInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sheilah Hogg-JohnsonInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jeffrey N KatzBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Sandra BrouwerCommunity and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Renée-Louise FrancheInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ute BültmannCommunity and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board #4010Workplace Safety and Insurance Board #6021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Organizational-level policies and practices that promote safety leadership and practices, disability management and ergonomic policies and practices are considered key contextual determinants of return to work. Our objective was to examine the role of worker-reported organizational policies and practices (OPPs) in return to work (RTW) and work role functioning (WRF) and the mediating role of pain self-efficacy and work accommodation. Methods A worker cohort (n = 577) in Ontario, Canada was followed at 1, 6 and 12 months post injury. Both RTW (yes/no) and WRF (WLQ-16) status (3 levels) were measured. OPPs were measured (high vs. low) at 1 month post-injury. Pain self-efficacy (PSE) and work accommodation (WA) were included in mediation analyses. Results OPPs predicted RTW at 6 months (adjusted OR 1.77; 95 % CI 1.07-2.93) and 12 months (adjusted OR 2.07; 95 % CI 1.18-3.62). OPPs predicted WRF at 6 months, but only the transition from working with limitations to working without limitations (adjusted OR 3.21; 95 % CI 1.92-5.39). At 12 months, OPPs predicted both the transition from not working to working with and without limitations and from not working or working with limitations to working without limitations (adjusted OR 2.13; 95 % CI 1.37-3.30). Offers of WA mediated the relationship between OPPs and both RTW and WRF at 6 months follow-up. PSE mediated the relationship between OPPs and RTW and WRF at 6 months. At 12 months neither mediated the relationship. Conclusions The findings support worker-reported OPPs as key determinants of both RTW and WRF. These results point to the importance of WA and PSE in both RTW and WRF at 6 months.

Indexed as

Organizational PolicyAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesOccupational InjuriesOdds RatioOntarioProspective StudiesReturn to WorkSurveys and QuestionnairesOrganizational policies and practicesReturn-to-workSelf-efficacyWork accommodationWork role functioning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.