Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27654494›Full record

Observational studyJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2017

The role of post-mortem MRI in the neonatal intensive care unit.

K Z Leadbetter, Z A Vesoulis, F V White, R E Schmidt, G Khanna, J S Shimony, A M Mathur

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?The British journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Inter-center variation in autopsy practices among regional neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Peri-mortem evaluation of infants who die without a diagnosis: focus on advances in genomic technology.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K Z LeadbetterDepartment of Pediatrics, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USAs.
Z A VesoulisEdward Mallinckrodt Department of Pediatrics, Division of Newborn Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
F V WhiteDepartment of Pathology & Immunology, Division of Anatomic and Molecular Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
R E SchmidtDepartment of Pathology & Immunology, Division of Neuropathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
G KhannaEdward Mallinckrodt Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
J S ShimonyEdward Mallinckrodt Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
A M MathurEdward Mallinckrodt Department of Pediatrics, Division of Newborn Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Mallinckrodt (United States) · USWashington University in St. Louis · USSouthern Illinois University School of Medicine · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesKL2TR000450 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$8.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePost-mortem examination can provide important information about the cause of death and play a significant role in the bereavement process. Autopsies reveal previous unknown medical problems approximately 20 to 30% of the time. A non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging-based post-mortem examination (PM-MRI) may provide an alternative for families who do not consent to an autopsy. STUDY

designThis study was a prospective observational study of recently expired neonates and infants. Subjects underwent a full body MRI scan (brain, chest, abdomen and pelvis) followed by conventional autopsy if the family desired to have one. MRI results were compared with autopsy findings and the ante-mortem clinical diagnosis. A follow-up survey was conducted to investigate family perceptions of the PM-MRI process.

resultsThirty-one infants underwent full PM-MRI. Of 31 infants, 19 (61%) had complete agreement between the clinician's impression and PM-MRI. Twenty-four infants also had conventional autopsy, with 14/24 (58%) infants having PM-MRI results consistent with autopsy findings. PM-MRI was superior at detection of free intraperitoneal/intrathoracic air and hepatic iron overload. Whole-body PM-MRI did not have the resolution to detect focal/microscopic injury, vascular remodeling and some forms of brain injury. Of those families who remembered the PM-MRI findings, the majority felt that the information was useful.

conclusionsPM-MRI studies may provide an important adjunct to conventional autopsy and a substitute when the latter is not possible for personal or religious reasons. Clinicians should be aware of, and communicate with the family, the resolution limits of the whole-body PM-MRI to detect certain types of injury.

Indexed as

AutopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingCause of DeathFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleMissouriProspective StudiesWhole Body Imaging

Identifiers

PMID27654494
PMCPMC5215703
OpenAlexW2523245791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.