ArticleSurgery today2017
Comparison of postoperative early and late complications between pancreas-sparing duodenectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy.
Article in Surgery today, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Limited (pancreas-sparing) surgical resections for non-ampullary duodenal neoplasms: indications, surgical techniques and outcomes.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Operative management of primary duodenal masses: is a limited resection actually safer?Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Nutritional benefits of pancreas-sparing total duodenectomy for severe duodenal polyposis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
- Short-term and long-term outcomes of pancreas preserving total duodenectomy: A case series from a single center with 13 years' experience and complimentary meta-analysis.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2025Article
- Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy as an alternative to emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation: a case report.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Pancreas-preserving limited duodenal resection: Minimizing morbidity without compromising oncological adequacy.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2022Article
- Efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in familial adenomatous polyposis patients after duodenectomy.DEN open · 2022Article
- Postoperative Outcome of Surgery with Pancreatic Resection for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Results of a Retrospective Bicentric Analysis on 50 Consecutive Patients.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021Article
- Long-Term Outcomes of Pancreas-Sparing Duodenectomy for Duodenal Polyposis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Syndrome.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021Article
- Pancreas- and Pylorus-Preserving Duodenectomy for Advanced Familial Duodenal Polyposis.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePancreas-sparing duodenectomy (PSD) represents an alternative procedure to pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for patients with duodenal neoplasms.
methodsThe postoperative early and late complications of 21 patients who underwent PSD between 1992 and 2014 were compared with those of 44 patients with soft pancreatic parenchyma who underwent PD between 2009 and 2014.
resultsThe median operation time and blood loss were less in the PSD group than in the PD group (P < 0.001). The overall incidence of early complications was less in the PSD group than in the PD group (PSD with ampullectomy vs. PSD without ampullectomy vs. PD; 45.5 vs. 20.0 vs. 56.8 %). The incidence of pancreatic fistula formation and overall incidence of late complications were also less in the PSD group than in the PD group (P = 0.031, 0.020). There were no complications related to the pancreatic endocrine or exocrine functions in the PSD group.
conclusionPSD is a less-invasive procedure and has the advantage over PD of preserving the pancreas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.