Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27654336›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Burkholderia pseudomallei: Challenges for the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.

Peera Hemarajata, Jonathan D Baghdadi, Risa Hoffman, Romney M Humphries

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Infection and drug resistance · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Serodiagnosis of Abdominal Abscess Caused byInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  13. Monitoring Laboratory Occupational Exposures toApplied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2022
    Article
  14. A Case ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Qatar medical journal · 2022
    Article
  17. Aortic endograft infection secondary toJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. A rare case: first description of a patient with melioidosis presenting with pericardial effusion in Germany.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021
    Article
  20. Burkholderia pseudomallei Clinical Isolates Are Highly SusceptibleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peera HemarajataDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6182-9136
Jonathan D BaghdadiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Risa HoffmanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Romney M HumphriesDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA rhumphries@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melioidosis is a potentially fatal infection caused by the bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei Clinical diagnosis of melioidosis can be challenging since there is no pathognomonic clinical syndrome, and the organism is often misidentified by methods used routinely in clinical laboratories. Although the disease is more prevalent in Thailand and northern Australia, sporadic cases may be encountered in areas where it is not endemic, including the United States. Since the organism is considered a tier 1 select agent according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, clinical laboratories must be proficient at rapidly recognizing isolates suspicious for B. pseudomallei, be able to safely perform necessary rule-out tests, and to refer suspect isolates to Laboratory Response Network reference laboratories. In this minireview, we report a case of melioidosis encountered at our institution and discuss the laboratory challenges encountered when dealing with clinical isolates suspicious for B. pseudomallei or clinical specimens from suspected melioidosis cases.

Indexed as

AgedAneurysm, InfectedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Typing TechniquesBurkholderia pseudomalleiDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleHumansMelioidosisMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID27654336
PMCPMC5121373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.