Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27654025›Full record

ArticleProteins2017

Human and server docking prediction for CAPRI round 30-35 using LZerD with combined scoring functions.

Lenna X Peterson, Hyungrae Kim, Juan Esquivel-Rodriguez, Amitava Roy, Xusi Han, Woong-Hee Shin, Jian Zhang, Genki Terashi, Matt Lee, Daisuke Kihara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. LZerD Protein-Protein Docking Webserver Enhanced WithFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. What method to use for protein-protein docking?Current opinion in structural biology · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lenna X PetersonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Hyungrae KimDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Juan Esquivel-RodriguezDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Amitava RoyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Xusi HanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Woong-Hee ShinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Jian ZhangDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Genki TerashiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Matt LeeLilly Biotechnology Center San Diego, 10300 Campus Point Drive, San Diego, California.
Daisuke KiharaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

Funding

Identification of protein-metabolite interactome.R01GM097528 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI KIHARA, DAISUKE · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the performance of protein-protein docking predictions by our group for recent rounds of the Critical Assessment of Prediction of Interactions (CAPRI), a community-wide assessment of state-of-the-art docking methods. Our prediction procedure uses a protein-protein docking program named LZerD developed in our group. LZerD represents a protein surface with 3D Zernike descriptors (3DZD), which are based on a mathematical series expansion of a 3D function. The appropriate soft representation of protein surface with 3DZD makes the method more tolerant to conformational change of proteins upon docking, which adds an advantage for unbound docking. Docking was guided by interface residue prediction performed with BindML and cons-PPISP as well as literature information when available. The generated docking models were ranked by a combination of scoring functions, including PRESCO, which evaluates the native-likeness of residues' spatial environments in structure models. First, we discuss the overall performance of our group in the CAPRI prediction rounds and investigate the reasons for unsuccessful cases. Then, we examine the performance of several knowledge-based scoring functions and their combinations for ranking docking models. It was found that the quality of a pool of docking models generated by LZerD, that is whether or not the pool includes near-native models, can be predicted by the correlation of multiple scores. Although the current analysis used docking models generated by LZerD, findings on scoring functions are expected to be universally applicable to other docking methods. Proteins 2017; 85:513-527. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareAmino Acid MotifsBenchmarkingBinding SitesComputational BiologyHumansMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MappingProtein MultimerizationProteinsResearch DesignStructural Homology, ProteinThermodynamicsProteinsWaterCAPRIcomputational methodsprediction accuracyprotein docking predictionprotein-protein dockingprotein structure predictionstructure modeling

Identifiers

PMID27654025
PMCPMC5313330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.