Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27653973›Full record

ReviewRNA biology2016

Decoding sORF translation - from small proteins to gene regulation.

Luis Enrique Cabrera-Quio, Sarah Herberg, Andrea Pauli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RNA biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Micropeptides translated from putative long non-coding RNAs.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The role of micropeptides in biology.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  18. Full-Length Transcriptome Analysis ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luis Enrique Cabrera-Quioa The Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter (VBC) , Vienna , Austria.
Sarah Herberga The Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter (VBC) , Vienna , Austria.
Andrea Paulia The Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter (VBC) , Vienna , Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translation is best known as the fundamental mechanism by which the ribosome converts a sequence of nucleotides into a string of amino acids. Extensive research over many years has elucidated the key principles of translation, and the majority of translated regions were thought to be known. The recent discovery of wide-spread translation outside of annotated protein-coding open reading frames (ORFs) came therefore as a surprise, raising the intriguing possibility that these newly discovered translated regions might have unrecognized protein-coding or gene-regulatory functions. Here, we highlight recent findings that provide evidence that some of these newly discovered translated short ORFs (sORFs) encode functional, previously missed small proteins, while others have regulatory roles. Based on known examples we will also speculate about putative additional roles and the potentially much wider impact that these translated regions might have on cellular homeostasis and gene regulation.

Indexed as

Open Reading FramesProtein BiosynthesisComputational BiologyGene Expression RegulationHomeostasisRibosomesRNA, MessengerRNA, MessengerRibosomeshort proteinssORFtranslationtranslational regulationuORF

Identifiers

PMID27653973
PMCPMC5100344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.