Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27653757›Full record

ReviewDrugs2016

Predictors of Response to Multiple Sclerosis Therapeutics in Individual Patients.

Harald Hegen, Michael Auer, Florian Deisenhammer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular biomarkers in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2019
    Review
  4. Assessing the Metabolomic Profile of Multiple Sclerosis Patients Treated with Interferon Beta 1a byNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2019
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The effect of disease modifying therapies on CD62L expression in multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harald HegenDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael AuerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Florian DeisenhammerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. florian.deisenhammer@tirol-kliniken.at.
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system. Several disease-modifying therapies have been shown to ameliorate the disease course; however, the individual treatment response and the occurrence of adverse events remain highly unpredictable. In the last 2 decades, a multitude of studies have aimed to identify biomarkers that enable treatment allocation in the individual patient or subgroup of patients with regard to treatment efficacy and safety profile. Following a PubMed database search, we provide an overview on what is presently known about body fluid markers for the prediction of response to the currently approved MS therapeutics. We also discuss the potential use of biomarkers with regard to drug-induced adverse events. To date, only a few molecules have been introduced in clinical routine: anti-drug antibodies against interferon (IFN)-β and natalizumab that are associated with abolished drug levels and treatment failure; anti-JC virus (JCV) antibody index that allows risk stratification for the development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare but severe adverse event during natalizumab treatment; and serostatus of varicella zoster virus as screening examination prior to fingolimod therapy to prevent the infection. A few candidate biomarkers still need closer examination, such as type I IFN signature and T-helper cell (Th)-17 reactivity for prediction of IFN-β treatment response, L-selectin expression for prediction of natalizumab-associated PML, interleukin (IL)-21 levels for prediction of secondary autoimmunity after exposure to alemtuzumab, lymphocyte count with regard to PML risk while receiving dimethyl fumarate or N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for monitoring of cardiac side effects during mitoxantrone therapy.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansInterferon-betaMultiple SclerosisPharmaceutical PreparationsTh17 CellsBiomarkersInterferon-betaPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID27653757
OpenAlexW2521995838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.