ReviewDrugs2016
Predictors of Response to Multiple Sclerosis Therapeutics in Individual Patients.
Review in Drugs, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-World Laboratory Analysis of Molecular Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis Centers in Central-Eastern European Countries Covering 107 Million Inhabitants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Absence of B Cells in Brainstem and White Matter Lesions Associates With Less Severe Disease and Absence of Oligoclonal Bands in MS.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2021Article
- Molecular biomarkers in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2019Review
- Assessing the Metabolomic Profile of Multiple Sclerosis Patients Treated with Interferon Beta 1a byNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2019Article
- 'No evidence of disease activity' - is it an appropriate surrogate in multiple sclerosis?European journal of neurology · 2018Review
- Progressive multiple sclerosis patients show substantial lesion activity that correlates with clinical disease severity and sex: a retrospective autopsy cohort analysis.Acta neuropathologica · 2018Article
- Efficacy of alemtuzumab and natalizumab in the treatment of different stages of multiple sclerosis patients.Medicine · 2018Article
- The effect of disease modifying therapies on CD62L expression in multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system. Several disease-modifying therapies have been shown to ameliorate the disease course; however, the individual treatment response and the occurrence of adverse events remain highly unpredictable. In the last 2 decades, a multitude of studies have aimed to identify biomarkers that enable treatment allocation in the individual patient or subgroup of patients with regard to treatment efficacy and safety profile. Following a PubMed database search, we provide an overview on what is presently known about body fluid markers for the prediction of response to the currently approved MS therapeutics. We also discuss the potential use of biomarkers with regard to drug-induced adverse events. To date, only a few molecules have been introduced in clinical routine: anti-drug antibodies against interferon (IFN)-β and natalizumab that are associated with abolished drug levels and treatment failure; anti-JC virus (JCV) antibody index that allows risk stratification for the development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare but severe adverse event during natalizumab treatment; and serostatus of varicella zoster virus as screening examination prior to fingolimod therapy to prevent the infection. A few candidate biomarkers still need closer examination, such as type I IFN signature and T-helper cell (Th)-17 reactivity for prediction of IFN-β treatment response, L-selectin expression for prediction of natalizumab-associated PML, interleukin (IL)-21 levels for prediction of secondary autoimmunity after exposure to alemtuzumab, lymphocyte count with regard to PML risk while receiving dimethyl fumarate or N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for monitoring of cardiac side effects during mitoxantrone therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.