Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27653484›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2016

Simulations of Membrane-Disrupting Peptides II: AMP Piscidin 1 Favors Surface Defects over Pores.

B Scott Perrin, Riqiang Fu, Myriam L Cotten, Richard W Pastor

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A unified model of transient poration induced by antimicrobial peptides.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Predicting Membrane-Active Peptide Dynamics in Fluidic Lipid Membranes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B Scott PerrinLaboratory of Computational Biology, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Riqiang FuNational High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Tallahassee, Florida.
Myriam L CottenDepartment of Applied Science, The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia.
Richard W PastorLaboratory of Computational Biology, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: pastorr@nhlbi.nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · USNational High Magnetic Field Laboratory · USWilliam & Mary · US

Funding

Computer Simulations of Membranes and BiopolymersZIAHL000340 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI PASTOR, RICHARD WALTER · 2009 to 2025
$29.1M
TrainingP41GM103712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FAEDER, JAMES · 2012 to 2021
$16.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that disrupt bacterial membranes are promising therapeutics against the growing number of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The mechanism of membrane disruption by the AMP piscidin 1 was examined with multimicrosecond all-atom molecular dynamics simulations and solid-state NMR spectroscopy. The primary simulation was initialized with 20 peptides in four barrel-stave pores in a fully hydrated 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine/1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoglycerol bilayer. The four pores relaxed to toroidal by 200 ns, only one porelike structure containing two transmembrane helices remained at 26 μs, and none of the 18 peptides released to the surface reinserted to form pores. The simulation was repeated at 413 K with an applied electric field and all peptides were surface-bound by 200 ns. Trajectories of surface-bound piscidin with and without applied fields at 313 and 413 K and totaling 6 μs show transient distortions of the bilayer/water interface (consistent with (31)P NMR), but no insertion to transmembrane or pore states. (15)N chemical shifts confirm a fully surface-bound conformation. Taken together, the simulation and experimental results imply that transient defects rather than stable pores are responsible for membrane disruption by piscidin 1, and likely other AMPs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesFishesFish ProteinsLipid BilayersMolecular Dynamics SimulationNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularPhosphatidylcholinesPhosphatidylglycerolsProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein StabilitySurface PropertiesWater1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylglycero-3-phosphoglycerol1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholineAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesFish ProteinsLipid Bilayersmoronecidin protein, Morone saxatilisPhosphatidylcholinesPhosphatidylglycerolsWater

Identifiers

PMID27653484
PMCPMC5034716
OpenAlexW2523229345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.