Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27653383›Full record

Trial reportJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2016

Recent Internet Use and Associations with Clinical Outcomes among Patients Entering Addiction Treatment Involved in a Web-Delivered Psychosocial Intervention Study.

B Tofighi, A N C Campbell, M Pavlicova, M C Hu, J D Lee, E V Nunes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A systematic scoping review of research on Black participants in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B TofighiDepartment of Population Health Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 227 E.30th St. 718, 10016, New York, NY, USA. Babak.tofighi@nyumc.org.
A N C CampbellNew York State Psychiatric Institute, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
M PavlicovaMailman School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
M C HuDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
J D LeeDepartment of Population Health Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 227 E.30th St. 718, 10016, New York, NY, USA.
E V NunesNew York State Psychiatric Institute, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USNew York University · US

Funding

Project-003UG1DA013035 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Aimee N Campbell, Jennifer McNeely · 2015 to 2026
$130.3M
NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acceptability and clinical impact of a web-based intervention among patients entering addiction treatment who lack recent internet access are unclear. This secondary analysis of a national multisite treatment study (NIDA Clinical Trials Network-0044) assessed for acceptability and clinical impact of a web-based psychosocial intervention among participants enrolling in community-based, outpatient addiction treatment programs. Participants were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of a web-based therapeutic education system (TES) based on the community reinforcement approach plus contingency management versus treatment as usual (TAU). Demographic and clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes were compared among participants with recent internet access in the 90 days preceding enrollment (N = 374) and without internet access (N = 133). Primary outcome variables included (1) acceptability of TES (i.e., module completion; acceptability of web-based intervention) and (2) clinical impact (i.e., self-reported abstinence confirmed by urine drug/breath alcohol tests; retention measured as time to dropout). Internet use was common (74 %) and was more likely among younger (18-49 years old) participants and those who completed high school (p < .001). Participants randomized to TES (n = 255) without baseline internet access rated the acceptability of TES modules significantly higher than those with internet access (t = 2.49, df = 218, p = .01). There was a near significant interaction between treatment, baseline abstinence, and internet access on time to dropout (χ

Indexed as

InternetTherapy, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportSubstance-Related DisordersYoung AdultAddictionComputer-assisted treatmentDisparitiesHealth information technologiesSubstance use disordersWeb-based treatment

Identifiers

PMID27653383
PMCPMC5052150
OpenAlexW2522944519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.