Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27653238›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2016

Applied Concepts in PBPK Modeling: How to Build a PBPK/PD Model.

L Kuepfer, C Niederalt, T Wendl, J-F Schlender, S Willmann, J Lippert, M Block, T Eissing, D Teutonico

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 224 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
224citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

224 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Best Practices in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

164 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

L KuepferBayer Technology Services, Leverkusen, Germany.
C NiederaltBayer Technology Services, Leverkusen, Germany.
T WendlBayer Technology Services, Leverkusen, Germany.
J-F SchlenderBayer Technology Services, Leverkusen, Germany.
S WillmannBayer HealthCare, Wuppertal, Germany.
J LippertBayer HealthCare, Wuppertal, Germany.
M BlockBayer Technology Services, Leverkusen, Germany.
T EissingBayer Technology Services, Leverkusen, Germany.
D TeutonicoBayer Technology Services, Leverkusen, Germany. donato.teutonico@servier.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this tutorial is to introduce the fundamental concepts of physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) modeling with a special focus on their practical implementation in a typical PBPK model building workflow. To illustrate basic steps in PBPK model building, a PBPK model for ciprofloxacin will be constructed and coupled to a pharmacodynamic model to simulate the antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin treatment.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPharmacokineticsAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansRisk AssessmentTissue Distribution

Identifiers

PMID27653238
PMCPMC5080648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.