Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27652799›Full record

ArticleVirulence2017

What's a SNP between friends: The influence of single nucleotide polymorphisms on virulence and phenotypes of Clostridium difficile strain 630 and derivatives.

Mark M Collery, Sarah A Kuehne, Shonna M McBride, Michelle L Kelly, Marc Monot, Alan Cockayne, Bruno Dupuy, Nigel P Minton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virulence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impacts ofJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Clostridioides difficile Sporulation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Glycine fermentation byInfection and immunity · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biological characteristics associated with virulence inEmerging microbes & infections · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. SpoIVA-SipL Complex Formation Is Essential forJournal of bacteriology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. mSphere · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mark M Collerya Clostridia Research Group , BBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Center (SBRC), School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK.
Sarah A Kuehnea Clostridia Research Group , BBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Center (SBRC), School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK.
Shonna M McBridec Department of Microbiology and Immunology , Emory Antibiotic Resistance Center, Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Michelle L Kellya Clostridia Research Group , BBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Center (SBRC), School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK.
Marc Monotd Laboratoire Pathogenèse des Bactéries Anaérobies , Institut Pasteur , Paris , France.
Alan Cockaynea Clostridia Research Group , BBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Center (SBRC), School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK.
Bruno Dupuyd Laboratoire Pathogenèse des Bactéries Anaérobies , Institut Pasteur , Paris , France.
Nigel P Mintona Clostridia Research Group , BBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Center (SBRC), School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0601176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clostridium difficile is a major cause of antibiotic induced diarrhea worldwide, responsible for significant annual mortalities and represents a considerable economic burden on healthcare systems. The two main C. difficile virulence factors are toxins A and B. Isogenic toxin B mutants of 2 independently isolated erythromycin-sensitive derivatives (630E and 630Δerm) of strain 630 were previously shown to exhibit substantively different phenotypes. Compared to 630, strain 630E and its progeny grow slower, achieve lower final cell densities, exhibit a reduced capacity for spore-formation, produce lower levels of toxin and are less virulent in the hamster infection model. By the same measures, strain 630Δerm and its derivatives more closely mirror the behavior of 630. Genome sequencing revealed that 630Δerm had acquired 7 unique Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) compared to 630 and 630E, while 630E had 9 SNPs and a DNA inversion not found in the other 2 strains. The relatively large number of mutations meant that the identification of those responsible for the altered properties of 630E was not possible, despite the restoration of 3 mutations to wildtype by allelic exchange and comparative RNAseq analysis of all 3 strains. The latter analysis revealed large differences in gene expression between the 3 strains, explaining in part why no single SNP could restore the phenotypic differences. Our findings suggest that strain 630Δerm should be favored over 630E as a surrogate for 630 in genetic-based studies. They also underline the importance of effective strain curation and the need to genome re-sequence master seed banks wherever possible.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsClostridioides difficileCricetinaeDiarrheaEnterotoxinsGene ExpressionGenome, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationPhenotypeVirulenceBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsEnterotoxinstcdA protein, Clostridium difficiletoxB protein, Clostridium difficileClosTronmotilitymutationsingle nucleotide polymorphismsporulationtoxin expressionvirulence

Identifiers

PMID27652799
PMCPMC5626343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.