ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2016
[Rectocele : Symptoms, diagnostics and therapy concepts from a coloproctological viewpoint].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Analysis of the Clinical Value of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy to Support the Posterior Compartment in Women with Multicompartment Prolapse Including Rectocele.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior rectocele is a common morphological condition in patients with obstructive defecation syndrome. Typical symptoms include incomplete evacuation, transanal or transvaginal digitation and soiling, which is frequently interpreted as fecal incontinence. Diagnosis of rectocele is made clinically and functional assessment of rectocele can be performed by dynamic imaging, e.g. by magnetic resonance (MR) defecography. Primary treatment should be conservative. Concerning surgical treatment, transanal, transperineal, transvaginal and transabdominal procedures are available. Evidence-based guidelines for surgical treatment are still lacking. The question whether rectocele is a cause or a consequence of obstructive defecation syndrome remains controversial. Accordingly, indications for surgical correction of rectocele should be considered with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.