ArticleApplied clinical informatics2016
Practical considerations for implementing genomic information resources. Experiences from eMERGE and CSER.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recommendations for return of secondary genomic findings in observational cohort studies.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Preparing healthcare providers to use polygenic risk scores: a qualitative study of learning needs and educational preferences.BMJ open · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Approach to Clinical Decision Support in the Return of Genome Informed Risk Assessments to Primary Care Pediatricians.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Studying the impact of translational genomic research: Lessons from eMERGE.American journal of human genetics · 2023Review
- Human-Centered Design Study to Inform Traceback Cascade Genetic Testing Programs at Three Integrated Health Systems.Public health genomics · 2023Article
- Infobuttons for Genomic Medicine: Requirements and Barriers.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
- The Implementation Chasm Hindering Genome-informed Health Care.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2020Article
- Sync for Genes: Making Clinical Genomics Available for Precision Medicine at the Point-of-Care.Applied clinical informatics · 2020Article
- Impact of Automatic Query Generation and Quality Recognition Using Deep Learning to Curate Evidence From Biomedical Literature: Empirical Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2019Article
- Integrating Genetic Data into Electronic Health Records: Medical Geneticists' Perspectives.Healthcare informatics research · 2019Article
- Opportunities, resources, and techniques for implementing genomics in clinical care.Lancet (London, England) · 2019Review
- Pharmacy students' attitudes and perceptions toward pharmacogenomics education.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2019Article
- Integrating Genomics into Healthcare: A Global Responsibility.American journal of human genetics · 2019Article
- Genomic Information for Clinicians in the Electronic Health Record: Lessons Learned From the Clinical Genome Resource Project and the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Physician-Reported Benefits and Barriers to Clinical Implementation of Genomic Medicine: A Multi-Site IGNITE-Network Survey.Journal of personalized medicine · 2018Article
- Standardization can accelerate the adoption of pharmacogenomics: current status and the path forward.Pharmacogenomics · 2018Review
- Association of Polygenic Risk Scores for Multiple Cancers in a Phenome-wide Study: Results from The Michigan Genomics Initiative.American journal of human genetics · 2018Article
- Clinical pharmacogenomics: patient perspectives of pharmacogenomic testing and the incidence of actionable test results in a chronic disease cohort.Personalized medicine · 2017Article
- Healthcare provider education to support integration of pharmacogenomics in practice: the eMERGE Network experience.Pharmacogenomics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo understand opinions and perceptions on the state of information resources specifically targeted to genomics, and approaches to delivery in clinical practice.
methodsWe conducted a survey of genomic content use and its clinical delivery from representatives across eight institutions in the electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) network and two institutions in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) consortium in 2014.
resultsEleven responses representing distinct projects across ten sites showed heterogeneity in how content is being delivered, with provider-facing content primarily delivered via the electronic health record (EHR) (n=10), and paper/pamphlets as the leading mode for patient-facing content (n=9). There was general agreement (91%) that new content is needed for patients and providers specific to genomics, and that while aspects of this content could be shared across institutions there remain site-specific needs (73% in agreement).
conclusionThis work identifies a need for the improved access to and expansion of information resources to support genomic medicine, and opportunities for content developers and EHR vendors to partner with institutions to develop needed resources, and streamline their use - such as a central content site in multiple modalities while implementing approaches to allow for site-specific customization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.