Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27652181›Full record

ReviewSpringerPlus2016

An overview of topic modeling and its current applications in bioinformatics.

Lin Liu, Lin Tang, Wen Dong, Shaowen Yao, Wei Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Evolution of research on global amphibian declines.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. SEEK-VEC: Robust Latent Structure Discovery via Ensemble Topic Modeling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lin LiuSchool of Information, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091 Yunnan China ; School of Information (Key Laboratory of Educational Informatization for Nationalities Ministry of Education), Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650092 Yunnan China.
Lin TangKey Laboratory of Educational Informatization for Nationalities Ministry of Education, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650092 Yunnan China.
Wen DongSchool of Information, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091 Yunnan China.
Shaowen YaoNational Pilot School of Software, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091 Yunnan China.
Wei ZhouNational Pilot School of Software, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091 Yunnan China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the rapid accumulation of biological datasets, machine learning methods designed to automate data analysis are urgently needed. In recent years, so-called topic models that originated from the field of natural language processing have been receiving much attention in bioinformatics because of their interpretability. Our aim was to review the application and development of topic models for bioinformatics. DESCRIPTION: This paper starts with the description of a topic model, with a focus on the understanding of topic modeling. A general outline is provided on how to build an application in a topic model and how to develop a topic model. Meanwhile, the literature on application of topic models to biological data was searched and analyzed in depth. According to the types of models and the analogy between the concept of document-topic-word and a biological object (as well as the tasks of a topic model), we categorized the related studies and provided an outlook on the use of topic models for the development of bioinformatics applications.

conclusionTopic modeling is a useful method (in contrast to the traditional means of data reduction in bioinformatics) and enhances researchers' ability to interpret biological information. Nevertheless, due to the lack of topic models optimized for specific biological data, the studies on topic modeling in biological data still have a long and challenging road ahead. We believe that topic models are a promising method for various applications in bioinformatics research.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsClassificationClusteringProbabilistic generative modelTopic model

Identifiers

PMID27652181
PMCPMC5028368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.