Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27651994›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2016

Testing the link between genome size and growth rate in maize.

Maud I Tenaillon, Domenica Manicacci, Stéphane D Nicolas, Francois Tardieu, Claude Welcker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Endoreplication-Why Are We Not Using Its Full Application Potential?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maud I TenaillonGénétique Quantitative et Evolution-Le Moulon, INRA-Université Paris-Sud-CNRS-AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay , Gif-sur-Yvette , France.
Domenica ManicacciGénétique Quantitative et Evolution-Le Moulon, INRA-Université Paris-Sud-CNRS-AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay , Gif-sur-Yvette , France.
Stéphane D NicolasGénétique Quantitative et Evolution-Le Moulon, INRA-Université Paris-Sud-CNRS-AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay , Gif-sur-Yvette , France.
Francois TardieuEcophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux, INRA , Montpellier , France.
Claude WelckerEcophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux, INRA , Montpellier , France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the factors driving within species Genome Size (GS) variation. GS may be shaped indirectly by natural selection on development and adaptative traits. Because GS variation is particularly pronounced in maize, we have sampled 83 maize inbred lines from three well described genetic groups adapted to contrasted climate conditions: inbreds of tropical origin, Flint inbreds grown in temperate climates, and Dent inbreds distributed in the Corn Belt. As a proxy for growth rate, we measured the Leaf Elongation Rate maximum during nighttime (LERmax) as well as GS in all inbred lines. In addition we combined available and new nucleotide polymorphism data at 29,090 sites to characterize the genetic structure of our panel. We found significant variation for both LERmax and GS among groups defined by our genetic structuring. Tropicals displayed larger GS than Flints while Dents exhibited intermediate values. LERmax followed the opposite trend with greater growth rate in Flints than in Tropicals. In other words, LERmax and GS exhibited a significantly negative correlation (r = - 0.27). However, this correlation was driven by among-group variation rather than within-group variation-it was no longer significant after controlling for structure and kinship among inbreds. Our results indicate that selection on GS may have accompanied ancient maize diffusion from its center of origin, with large DNA content excluded from temperate areas. Whether GS has been targeted by more intense selection during modern breeding within groups remains an open question.

Indexed as

AdaptationBreedingDNA contentLeaf elongation rateZea mays

Identifiers

PMID27651994
PMCPMC5018661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.