ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2016
The Effectiveness of Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in the Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral and intrauterine progestogens for atypical endometrial hyperplasia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Analysis of Non-responders to LNG-IUS in Cases of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2026Article
- Insights on Medical Therapy for Uterine Fibroids: A Review.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLevonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) has been shown to be an effective treatment for patients with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in many Western studies. The purpose of study was to examine the effectiveness of LNG-IUS in the treatment of Indian women with AUB.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of 70 women diagnosed with AUB and treated with LNG-IUS insertion between February 2010 and 2014 at the Department of Gynecology of Sree Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences. Baseline endometrial biopsies were done before insertion of LNG-IUS, and outpatient follow-up with symptom diary was undertaken at 3-month intervals after insertion of LNG-IUS.
resultsPrimary outcome in the two treatment groups was significantly greater among women assigned to levonorgestrel-IUS than among those assigned to usual treatment (mean difference in scores over the course of 1 year 13.4 points; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 9.9-16.9; P < 0.001). All six domains of the MMAS favored the levonorgestrel-IUS at every time point (P < 0.001) with the use of a test for trend.
conclusionIn conclusion, our study showed that both the levonorgestrel-IUS and usual medical treatments reduced the adverse effect of menorrhagia on women's lives over the course of 2 years, but the levonorgestrel-IUS was the more effective first choice, as assessed by the impact of bleeding on the women's quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.