Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27651646›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2016

Evaluation of Role of GnRH Antagonist in Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) Cycles with Mild Ovarian Hyperstimulation (MOH): A Prospective Randomised Study.

Leena Wadhwa, Rupali Khanna, Taru Gupta, Sangeeta Gupta, Sarika Arora, Sumi Nandwani

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leena WadhwaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ESI-Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science and Research, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, 110015 India ; Flat No 225, Sector-9, Pocket-1, DDA/SFS, Dwarka, New-Delhi, 110075 India.ORCID 0000-0003-1150-440X
Rupali KhannaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ESI-Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science and Research, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, 110015 India.
Taru GuptaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ESI-Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science and Research, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, 110015 India.
Sangeeta GuptaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ESI-Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science and Research, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, 110015 India.
Sarika AroraDepartment of Biochemistry, ESI-Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science and Research, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, 110015 India.
Sumi NandwaniDepartment of Microbiology, ESI-Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science and Research, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, 110015 India.
ESI - Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectiveTo evaluate the role of GnRH antagonist in prevention of premature LH surge and increasing pregnancy rates in IUI cycle with mild ovarian hyperstimulation (MOH). STUDY

designProspective parallel, randomised controlled study. MATERIAL AND

methodsCouples diagnosed with unexplained, male factor subfertility and with one or both tubes patent were randomised to receive either a GnRH antagonist (study group) or no intervention (control group). All women were treated with clomiphene citrate (D3-D7) followed by HMG. A GnRH antagonist was added when one or more follicles of 16 mm diameter or more were visualised in the study group. When at least one follicle reached a size of ≥18 mm, ovulation was induced by hCG injection. A single IUI was performed 36 h later. The primary outcome was premature LH surge and pregnancy rate. The secondary outcomes were the amount of gonadotropins used, duration of use of GnRH antagonist and incidence and severity of OHSS.

resultsA total of seventy patients attending the infertility clinic in the outpatient department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, of a tertiary care centre, were recruited in the study which was carried out from August 2011 to March 2013. The study group included 34 women and 36 in the control arm. The incidence of premature LH surge was significantly lower in the antagonist group as compared to the control group 2.9 vs. 13.9 %, with a p value of <0.001. The clinical pregnancy rates were similar in both the groups 8.8 vs. 11.1 %, p value being 1.000. The amount of gonadotropins used in GnRH antagonist group was lower than in control group but not statistically significant. Duration of GnRH antagonist was 1.85 ± 0.61 days in the study group.

conclusionThe delayed administration of GnRH antagonists in MOH with IUI cycles when follicle size is ≥16 mm is beneficial in terms of preventing the occurrence of premature LH surge but with no improvement in pregnancy rates.

Indexed as

AntagonistIUIMild ovarian hyperstimulation

Identifiers

PMID27651646
PMCPMC5016441
OpenAlexW2416733568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.