Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27651599›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2016

Caesarean Section for Foetal Distress and Correlation with Perinatal Outcome.

Richa Gangwar, Sarita Chaudhary

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richa GangwarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Sarita ChaudharyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Lady Hardinge Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main documented indication of intrapartum caesarean section is foetal distress (MacKenzie and Cooke in BMJ 323(7318):930, 2001). Foetal distress indicates foetal hypoxia and acidosis during intrauterine life. PURPOSE: To correlate the diagnosis of foetal distress and perinatal outcome.

methodsThis was a prospective observational study of women who underwent caesarean section for foetal distress as detected by cardiotocography and not responding to intrauterine resuscitation. The foetal Apgar score at 1 and 5 min was recorded and cord blood pH was measured in all cases. The neonatal outcome was studied with regard to the need for supportive ventilation and admission to NICU/nursery.

resultsIn our study, 14.38 % cases diagnosed with foetal distress subsequently had poor outcome. Twenty-one babies had a 5-min Apgar score <7, required immediate resuscitation and were admitted in NICU. Twelve foetuses had a 1-min Apgar score <4, while there were three cases of severe birth asphyxia (Apgar score <4 at 5 min); of these, two babies died. The neonatal outcome was poorer in cases with associated complicating factors.

conclusionThe diagnosis of foetal distress is imprecise and a poor predictor of foetal outcome-the result is a tendency for unnecessary caesarean sections. On the contrary, lack of adverse outcome could reflect that our unit makes decisions at a time before clinically significant foetal compromise occurs.

Indexed as

Caesarean sectionCardiotocographyFoetal distressPerinatal outcome

Identifiers

PMID27651599
PMCPMC5016439
OpenAlexW2306779414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.