ArticleOecologia2016
Foraging strategies of a generalist marine predator inhabiting a dynamic environment.
Article in Oecologia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The hunter or the hunted? Inferring benthic meso-predator behavior from swim velocity data.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Combined stomach content and stable isotope analyses revealed variations in trophic ecology of pacific cod in the east sea.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Feeding morphology and body size shape resource partitioning in an eared seal community.Biology letters · 2023Article
- Shifts in maternal foraging strategies during pregnancy promote offspring health and survival in a marine top predator.Oecologia · 2022Article
- Individuality counts: A new comprehensive approach to foraging strategies of a tropical marine predator.Oecologia · 2021Article
- Article
- Sex-differences in fine-scale home-range use in an upper-trophic level marine predator.Movement ecology · 2020Article
- Diving deep into trouble: the role of foraging strategy and morphology in adapting to a changing environment.Conservation physiology · 2020Article
- Time Domains of Hypoxia Adaptation-Elephant Seals Stand Out Among Divers.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
- The energetic consequences of behavioral variation in a marine carnivore.Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Characterizing habitat suitability for a central-place forager in a dynamic marine environment.Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Vibrissa growth rate in California sea lions based on environmental and isotopic oscillations.PloS one · 2018Article
- Intraspecific variation in feeding strategies of Galapagos sea lions: A case of trophic specialization.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraspecific variability is increasingly recognized as an important component of foraging behavior that can have implications for both population and community dynamics. We used an individual-level approach to describe the foraging behavior of an abundant, generalist predator that inhabits a dynamic marine ecosystem, focusing specifically on the different foraging strategies used by individuals in the same demographic group. We collected data on movements and diving behavior of adult female California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) across multiple foraging trips to sea. Sea lions (n = 35) used one of three foraging strategies that primarily differed in their oceanic zone and dive depth: a shallow, epipelagic strategy, a mixed epipelagic/benthic strategy, and a deep-diving strategy. Individuals varied in their degree of fidelity to a given strategy, with 66 % of sea lions using only one strategy on all or most of their foraging trips across the two-month tracking period. All foraging strategies were present in each of the sampling years, but there were inter-annual differences in the population-level importance of each strategy that may reflect changes in prey availability. Deep-diving sea lions traveled shorter distances and spent a greater proportion of time at the rookery than sea lions using the other two strategies, which may have energetic and reproductive implications. These results highlight the importance of an individual-based approach in describing the foraging behavior of female California sea lions and understanding how they respond to the seasonal and annual changes in prey availability that characterize the California Current System.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27651228What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.