Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27650892›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Engineering new balancer chromosomes in C. elegans via CRISPR/Cas9.

Satoru Iwata, Sawako Yoshina, Yuji Suehiro, Sayaka Hori, Shohei Mitani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genome sequencing ofGenome research · 2023
    Article
  3. Speciation and adaptation research meets genome editing.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Floxed exon (Flexon): A flexibly positioned stop cassette for recombinase-mediated conditional gene expression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The joy of balancers.PLoS genetics · 2019
    Review
  13. TheGenetics · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Comprehensive functional genomics using Caenorhabditis elegans as a model organism.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Satoru IwataDepartment of Physiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Sawako YoshinaDepartment of Physiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuji SuehiroDepartment of Physiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Sayaka HoriDepartment of Physiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shohei MitaniDepartment of Physiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Balancer chromosomes are convenient tools used to maintain lethal mutations in heterozygotes. We established a method for engineering new balancers in C. elegans by using the CRISPR/Cas9 system in a non-homologous end-joining mutant. Our studies will make it easier for researchers to maintain lethal mutations and should provide a path for the development of a system that generates rearrangements at specific sites of interest to model and analyse the mechanisms of action of genes.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsMutationAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCaenorhabditis elegansChromosomesGenetic Engineering

Identifiers

PMID27650892
PMCPMC5030659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.