Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27650862›Full record

ArticleResuscitation2016

Long-term survival benefit from treatment at a specialty center after cardiac arrest.

Jonathan Elmer, Jon C Rittenberger, Patrick J Coppler, Francis X Guyette, Ankur A Doshi, Clifton W Callaway, Pittsburgh Post-Cardiac Arrest Service

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07002294 (The Effect of SPecialty cAre on Recovery From Cardiac Arrest Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07002294 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of SPecialty cAre on Recovery From Cardiac Arrest Trial (the SPARC Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2026 to 2032Enrolled1,618ConditionsCardiac Arrest (CA), Heart Arrest, Heart Arrest, Out-Of-HospitalArmsTransfer to specialty care, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan ElmerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA, United States; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA, United States. Electronic address: elmerp@upmc.edu.
Jon C RittenbergerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA, United States.
Patrick J CopplerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA, United States; Department of Physician Assistant Studies, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Francis X GuyetteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA, United States.
Ankur A DoshiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA, United States.
Clifton W CallawayDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA, United States.
Pittsburgh Post-Cardiac Arrest Service

Funding

Pittsburgh Career Development Program in Emergency Medicine ResearchK12HL109068 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CALLAWAY, CLIFTON W., YEALY, DONALD M · 2011 to 2015
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL109068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Institute of Medicine and American Heart Association have called for tiered accreditation standards and regionalization of post-cardiac arrest care, but there is little data to support that regionalization has a durable effect on patient outcomes. We tested the effect of treatment at a high-volume center on long-term outcome after sudden cardiac arrest (SCA).

methodsWe included patients hospitalized at one of 7 medical centers in Southwestern Pennsylvania after SCA from 2005 to 2013. Centers were one regional referral center with an organized systems for post-SCA care, two moderate volume tertiary care centers and 4 low-volume centers. We abstracted clinical characteristics and outcomes at hospital discharge, and for survivors to discharge we queried the National Death Index for long-term survival data. We used Cox regression to determine the unadjusted associations of baseline predictors and survival, and built an adjusted model controlling for baseline predictors.

resultsOverall, 987 patients survived to discharge. During 2196 person-years of follow-up, median survival was 5.3 years and there were 396 deaths. In unadjusted analysis, treating center, age, arrest location, Charlson Comorbidity Index, initial rhythm, cardiac catheterization, defibrillator placement, discharge disposition, and neurological status at discharge were associated with long-term outcome. In adjusted analysis, treatment at the high-volume cardiac arrest center was associated with improved survival compared to treatment at other centers (hazards ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.86).

conclusionTreatment at a high-volume cardiac arrest center with organized systems for post-arrest care is associated with a substantial long-term survival benefit after hospital discharge.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationAgedCancer Care FacilitiesFemaleHospitals, High-VolumeHospitals, Low-VolumeHumansMaleMiddle AgedOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestPatient DischargeProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRegistriesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeCardiac arrestOutcomeRegionalizationSurvival

Identifiers

PMID27650862
PMCPMC5850957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.