Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27650833›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology practice2016

Regional Multiteam Systems in Cancer Care Delivery.

Katia Noyes, John R T Monson, Irfan Rizvi, Ann Savastano, James S A Green, Nick Sevdalis

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katia NoyesUniversity of Rochester Medical Center; American Cancer Society, Hope Lodge, Rochester; St James Mercy Hospital, Hornell, NY; Barts Health; and Center for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
John R T MonsonUniversity of Rochester Medical Center; American Cancer Society, Hope Lodge, Rochester; St James Mercy Hospital, Hornell, NY; Barts Health; and Center for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Irfan RizviUniversity of Rochester Medical Center; American Cancer Society, Hope Lodge, Rochester; St James Mercy Hospital, Hornell, NY; Barts Health; and Center for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ann SavastanoUniversity of Rochester Medical Center; American Cancer Society, Hope Lodge, Rochester; St James Mercy Hospital, Hornell, NY; Barts Health; and Center for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
James S A GreenUniversity of Rochester Medical Center; American Cancer Society, Hope Lodge, Rochester; St James Mercy Hospital, Hornell, NY; Barts Health; and Center for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nick SevdalisUniversity of Rochester Medical Center; American Cancer Society, Hope Lodge, Rochester; St James Mercy Hospital, Hornell, NY; Barts Health; and Center for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teamwork is essential for addressing many of the challenges that arise in the coordination and delivery of cancer care, especially for the problems that are presented by patients who cross geographic boundaries and enter and exit multiple health care systems at various times during their cancer care journeys. The problem of coordinating the care of patients with cancer is further complicated by the growing number of treatment options and modalities, incompatibilities among the vast variety of technology platforms that have recently been adopted by the health care industry, and competing and misaligned incentives for providers and systems. Here we examine the issue of regional care coordination in cancer through the prism of a real patient journey. This article will synthesize and elaborate on existing knowledge about coordination approaches for complex systems, in particular, in general and cancer care multidisciplinary teams; define elements of coordination derived from organizational psychology and human factors research that are applicable to team-based cancer care delivery; and suggest approaches for improving multidisciplinary team coordination in regional cancer care delivery and avenues for future research. The phenomenon of the mobile, multisystem patient represents a growing challenge in cancer care. Paradoxically, development of high-quality, high-volume centers of excellence and the ease of virtual communication and data sharing by using electronic medical records have introduced significant barriers to effective team-based cancer care. These challenges urgently require solutions.

Indexed as

CommunicationCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPatient Care TeamRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27650833
PMCPMC5455419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.