Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27650763›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Evaluation of the first pharmacist-administered vaccinations in Western Australia: a mixed-methods study.

H Laetitia Hattingh, T Fei Sim, R Parsons, P Czarniak, A Vickery, S Ayadurai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Letter: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pharmacist-administered vaccination services.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H Laetitia HattinghFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
T Fei SimFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
R ParsonsFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Occupational Health & Social Work and School Pharmacy, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
P CzarniakFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
A VickeryDepartment of General Practice, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
S AyaduraiFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Curtin University · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study evaluated the uptake of Western Australian (WA) pharmacist vaccination services, the profiles of consumers being vaccinated and the facilitators and challenges experienced by pharmacy staff in the preparation, implementation and delivery of services.

designMixed-methods methodology with both quantitative and qualitative data through surveys, pharmacy computer records and immuniser pharmacist interviews.

settingCommunity pharmacies in WA that provided pharmacist vaccination services between March and October 2015.

participantsImmuniser pharmacists from 86 pharmacies completed baseline surveys and 78 completed exit surveys; computer records from 57 pharmacies; 25 immuniser pharmacists were interviewed.

main outcome measuresPharmacy and immuniser pharmacist profiles; pharmacist vaccination services provided and consumer profiles who accessed services.

results15 621 influenza vaccinations were administered by immuniser pharmacists at 76 WA community pharmacies between March and October 2015. There were no major adverse events, and <1% of consumers experienced minor events which were appropriately managed. Between 12% and 17% of consumers were eligible to receive free influenza vaccinations under the National Immunisation Program but chose to have it at a pharmacy. A high percentage of vaccinations was delivered in rural and regional areas indicating that provision of pharmacist vaccination services facilitated access for rural and remote consumers. Immuniser pharmacists reported feeling confident in providing vaccination services and were of the opinion that services should be expanded to other vaccinations. Pharmacists also reported significant professional satisfaction in providing the service. All participating pharmacies intended to continue providing influenza vaccinations in 2016.

conclusionsThis initial evaluation of WA pharmacist vaccination services showed that vaccine delivery was safe. Convenience and accessibility were important aspects in usage of services. There is scope to expand pharmacist vaccination services to other vaccines and younger children; however, government funding to pharmacists needs to be considered.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesPharmacistsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansImmunization ProgramsInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesVaccinationWestern AustraliaInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID27650763
PMCPMC5051390
OpenAlexW2521852188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.