Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27650542›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Epithelial splicing regulatory protein 1 and 2 paralogues correlate with splice signatures and favorable outcome in human colorectal cancer.

Abigail J Deloria, Doris Höflmayer, Philip Kienzl, Justyna Łopatecka, Sandra Sampl, Martin Klimpfinger, Tamara Braunschmid, Fabienne Bastian, Lingeng Lu, Brigitte Marian and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Abigail J DeloriaDivision of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
Doris HöflmayerDepartment of Pathology and Bacteriology, Social Medical Center South, Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Philip KienzlDivision of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
Justyna ŁopateckaDivision of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
Sandra SamplDivision of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
Martin KlimpfingerDepartment of Pathology and Bacteriology, Social Medical Center South, Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Tamara BraunschmidDepartment of Surgery, Social Medical Center South, Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Fabienne BastianDepartment of Surgery, Social Medical Center South, Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Lingeng LuDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, USA.
Brigitte MarianDivision of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
Stefan StättnerDepartment of Surgery, Social Medical Center South, Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Klaus HolzmannDivision of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATKaiser-Franz-Josef-Spital · ATYale Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ESRPs are master splice regulators implicated in alternative mRNA splicing programs important for epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and tumor progression. ESRP1 was identified in some tumors as good or worse predictor of outcome, but in colorectal cancer (CRC) the prognostic value of ESRPs and relation with mesenchymal splice variants is not clear. Here, we studied 68 CRC cases, compared tissue expression of ESRPs with clinical data and with EMT gene splice patterns of conditional CRC cells with deficient ESRP1 expression.Around 72% of patients showed global decreased transcript expression of both ESRPs in tumor as compared to matched non-neoplastic colorectal epithelium. Reduction of ESRP1 in tumor cells was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, associated with microsatellite stability and switch to mesenchymal splice signatures of FGFRs, CD44, ENAH and CTNND1(p120-catenin). Expression of ESRPs was significantly associated with favorable overall survival (log-rank test, P=0.0186 and 0.0408), better than prognostic stratification by tumor staging; and for ESRP1 confirmed with second TCGA cohort (log-rank test, P=0.0435). Prognostic value is independent of the pathological stage and microsatellite instability (ESRP1: HR=0.36, 95%CI 0.15-0.91, P=0.032; ESRP2: HR=0.23, 95%CI 0.08-0.65, P=0.006).Our study supports the role of ESRP1 as tumor suppressor and strongly suggests that ESRPs are candidate markers for early detection, diagnosis, and prognosis of CRC.

Indexed as

RNA SplicingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGene ExpressionHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingESRP1 protein, humanESRP2 protein, humanRNA-Binding Proteinscolorectal cancerepithelial splicing regulatory proteinmicrosatellite instabilityoverall survivalprognostic marker

Identifiers

PMID27650542
PMCPMC5342015
OpenAlexW2521008679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.