Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27650452›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2017

Treatment for long bone metastases based on a systematic literature review.

Costantino Errani, Andreas F Mavrogenis, Luca Cevolani, Silvia Spinelli, Andrea Piccioli, Giulio Maccauro, Nicola Baldini, Davide Donati

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06918860 (Complications, Implant Survival and Functional Results After Surgical Treatment of Bone Metastases of Proximal Femur With Intramedullary Nail or Prosthetic Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06918860 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Complications, Implant Survival and Functional Results After Surgical Treatment of Bone Metastases of Proximal Femur With Intramedullary Nail or Prosthetic Reconstruction

TypeobservationalSponsorCostantino ErraniRan2024 to 2026Enrolled600ConditionsBone MetastasesArmsAnalysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Complication and revision risks of surgical treatment for proximal humerus metastases: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Surgical management of tibial metastases: a systematic review.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinical application of LARS tumor tube in joint function reconstruction of tumor type artificial hip replacement.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Costantino ErraniDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Andreas F MavrogenisFirst Department of Orthopaedics, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. afm@otenet.gr.
Luca CevolaniDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Silvia SpinelliDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Catholic University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Andrea PiccioliDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Catholic University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Giulio MaccauroDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Umberto I University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Nicola BaldiniDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Davide DonatiDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRPoliclinico Umberto I · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide treatment guidelines for patients with long bone metastatic disease based on a systematic review of the literature and to propose an algorithm to guide orthopedic surgeons in decision-making for these patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a computerized literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus for studies on patients with long bone metastases. We used the key words "long bones", "metastasis" and "treatment" for published studies that evaluated any treatment for long bone metastases. The articles found were then studied to determine the accuracy of surgical treatments for long bone metastases in every anatomic location, regardless of cancer type, stage and grade of the oncologic disease. Guidelines inferred from this literature review were collected, and an algorithm was proposed.

resultsThere was no clear evidence to support excision of a long bone metastatic lesion at the same surgical setting with internal fixation or prosthetic reconstruction. However, en bloc resection of an isolated bone metastasis may have a beneficial effect on survival. The life expectancy of the patients should be considered for any surgical treatment. Internal fixation preferably with reconstruction nails is indicated for meta-diaphyseal lesions; their rate of mechanical failure and complications ranges from 2 to 22 %. Prosthetic reconstruction is indicated for extensive lytic lesions or pathologic fractures in a meta-epiphyseal locations; their rate of mechanical failure and complications ranges from 3.7 to 35 %. Most of the internal fixation-related complications occur more than 1 year after treatment, in contrast to prosthetic reconstruction-related complications that may occur earlier.

conclusionsIntramedullary nail fixation or prosthetic reconstruction should be chosen on the basis of the location of the lesion, the extent of bone destruction and the stability of the construct to outlast the expected life of the patient. Implant-related complication is similar but may occur earlier with prosthetic reconstructions.

Indexed as

Bone NailsBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsClinical Decision-MakingFemaleFemoral NeoplasmsFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryFractures, SpontaneousHumansKidney NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsMalePrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsThyroid NeoplasmsLong bonesMetastatic bone diseaseSurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID27650452
OpenAlexW2522401322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.