Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27650276›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017

Retention of the well-fixed implant in the single-stage exchange for chronic infected total hip arthroplasty: an average of five years of follow-up.

Baochao Ji, Boyong Xu, Wentao Guo, Aili Rehei, Wenbo Mu, Desheng Yang, Li Cao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Partial versus full revision in cementless single-stage exchange for hip periprosthetic joint infection: a multicenter comparative study with 10-year survivorship analysis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Role of One-Stage Exchange for Prosthetic Joint Infection.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Baochao JiDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137 South LiYuShan Road, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830054, China.
Boyong XuDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137 South LiYuShan Road, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830054, China.
Wentao GuoDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137 South LiYuShan Road, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830054, China.
Aili ReheiDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137 South LiYuShan Road, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830054, China.
Wenbo MuDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137 South LiYuShan Road, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830054, China.
Desheng YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137 South LiYuShan Road, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830054, China.
Li CaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137 South LiYuShan Road, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830054, China. xjbone@21cn.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University · CNXinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRemoval of an infected prosthesis was considered the gold standard for eradication of infection. However, removal of well-fixed components can result in structural bone damage and compromised reconstruction. In these situations we questioned whether the infection after the total hip arthroplasty could be treated effectively and retain the well-fixed implant in a single-stage exchange.

methodsA retrospective analysis which included 31 patients with chronic infected THA who underwent major partial single-stage revision, including routinely exchanged femoral head and liner components, aggressive soft tissue debridement, removal of the femoral stem or acetabular cup and retention of the well-fixed component, thorough exposed component brushing, and adequate surgical soaking. Powdered Vancomycin was poured into the surgical area and the infection control rate and clinical outcomes were evaluated. The failure to treat the infection was defined as a recurrence of infection in the same hip. The average follow-up was five years (2-15 years).

resultThere were four (12.9 %) failures during the study period at an average of 15 months (9-21 months) after partial single-stage revision. Of the 31 patients, 27 (87.1 %) patients had a satisfactory outcome and required no additional surgical or medical treatment for recurrence of infection. Acetabular cups were revised in 22 patients and femoral stems in nine patients. The mean post-operative Harris hip score at the most recent assessment was 74.6 (68-82).

conclusionsTreatment of chronic infected THA with retention of the well-fixed implant in a single-stage exchange can be fairly effective in the treatment of infection and achieving acceptable functional outcomes, which indicated that this may be an attractive alternative in highly selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipAdministration, TopicalAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsChronic DiseaseDevice RemovalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHip ProsthesisHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsseointegrationProsthesis-Related InfectionsReoperationAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinPeriprosthetic joint infectionSingle-stage revisionTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID27650276
OpenAlexW2521925890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.