Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27649487›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2016

"The Policy Dystopia Model": Implications for Health Advocates and Democratic Governance.

Elizabeth A Smith, Patricia A McDaniel

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth A SmithDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Patricia A McDanielDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Funding

The Tobacco Problem:Public Health Implications of Contested FramesR01CA120138 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MALONE, RUTH E · 2006 to 2016
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this Perspective on the research article by Ulucanlar and colleagues, Elizabeth Smith and Patricia McDaniel discuss how industry opposition to regulation can undermine the public's overall confidence in government and science.

Indexed as

Health PolicyModels, TheoreticalPublic HealthPoliticsTobacco Industry

Identifiers

PMID27649487
PMCPMC5029813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.