Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27649315›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Penetration and Effectiveness of Micronized Copper in Refractory Wood Species.

Chiara Civardi, Jan Van den Bulcke, Mark Schubert, Elisabeth Michel, Maria Isabel Butron, Matthieu N Boone, Manuel Dierick, Joris Van Acker, Peter Wick, Francis W M R Schwarze

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparative Copper Resistance Strategies ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chiara CivardiETH, Institute for Building Materials, Zürich, Switzerland.
Jan Van den BulckeUGCT - Woodlab-UGent, Laboratory of Wood Technology, Department of Forest and Water Management, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Mark SchubertEmpa, Applied Wood Materials, Dübendorf/ St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Elisabeth MichelEmpa, Advanced Fibers, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Maria Isabel ButronEmpa, Applied Wood Materials, Dübendorf/ St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Matthieu N BooneUGCT - Radiation Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Proeftuinstraat 86/N12, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Manuel DierickUGCT - Radiation Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Proeftuinstraat 86/N12, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Joris Van AckerUGCT - Woodlab-UGent, Laboratory of Wood Technology, Department of Forest and Water Management, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Peter WickEmpa, Particles-Biology Interactions, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Francis W M R SchwarzeEmpa, Applied Wood Materials, Dübendorf/ St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology · CHGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The North American wood decking market mostly relies on easily treatable Southern yellow pine (SYP), which is being impregnated with micronized copper (MC) wood preservatives since 2006. These formulations are composed of copper (Cu) carbonate particles (CuCO3·Cu(OH)2), with sizes ranging from 1 nm to 250 μm, according to manufacturers. MC-treated SYP wood is protected against decay by solubilized Cu2+ ions and unreacted CuCO3·Cu(OH)2 particles that successively release Cu2+ ions (reservoir effect). The wood species used for the European wood decking market differ from the North American SYP. One of the most common species is Norway spruce wood, which is poorly treatable i.e. refractory due to the anatomical properties, like pore size and structure, and chemical composition, like pit membrane components or presence of wood extractives. Therefore, MC formulations may not suitable for refractory wood species common in the European market, despite their good performance in SYP. We evaluated the penetration effectiveness of MC azole (MCA) in easily treatable Scots pine and in refractory Norway spruce wood. We assessed the effectiveness against the Cu-tolerant wood-destroying fungus Rhodonia placenta. Our findings show that MCA cannot easily penetrate refractory wood species and could not confirm the presence of a reservoir effect.

Indexed as

CarbonatesCopperCoriolaceaeHost-Pathogen InteractionsNorwayParticle SizePiceaPinusPlant DiseasesSpecies SpecificityWoodCarbonatesCoppercopper carbonate

Identifiers

PMID27649315
PMCPMC5029918
OpenAlexW2522458915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.