Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27649220›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Utilizing Chinese Admission Records for MACE Prediction of Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Danqing Hu, Zhengxing Huang, Tak-Ming Chan, Wei Dong, Xudong Lu, Huilong Duan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Danqing HuCollege of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China. danqinghu1990@zju.edu.cn.
Zhengxing HuangCollege of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China. zhengxinghuang@zju.edu.cn.
Tak-Ming ChanPhilips Research China-Healthcare, Shanghai 200233, China. Cyrus.chan@philips.com.
Wei DongDepartment of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China. 301dongw@sina.com.
Xudong LuCollege of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China. lvxd@zju.edu.cn.
Huilong DuanCollege of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China. duanhl@zju.edu.cn.
Zhejiang University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNPhilips (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) prediction of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is important for a number of applications including physician decision support, quality of care assessment, and efficient healthcare service delivery on ACS patients. Admission records, as typical media to contain clinical information of patients at the early stage of their hospitalizations, provide significant potential to be explored for MACE prediction in a proactive manner.

methodsWe propose a hybrid approach for MACE prediction by utilizing a large volume of admission records. Firstly, both a rule-based medical language processing method and a machine learning method (i.e., Conditional Random Fields (CRFs)) are developed to extract essential patient features from unstructured admission records. After that, state-of-the-art supervised machine learning algorithms are applied to construct MACE prediction models from data.

resultsWe comparatively evaluate the performance of the proposed approach on a real clinical dataset consisting of 2930 ACS patient samples collected from a Chinese hospital. Our best model achieved 72% AUC in MACE prediction. In comparison of the performance between our models and two well-known ACS risk score tools, i.e., GRACE and TIMI, our learned models obtain better performances with a significant margin.

conclusionsExperimental results reveal that our approach can obtain competitive performance in MACE prediction. The comparison of classifiers indicates the proposed approach has a competitive generality with datasets extracted by different feature extraction methods. Furthermore, our MACE prediction model obtained a significant improvement by comparison with both GRACE and TIMI. It indicates that using admission records can effectively provide MACE prediction service for ACS patients at the early stage of their hospitalizations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHealth Status IndicatorsAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionPrognosisRisk Assessmentacute coronary syndromeadmission recordhybrid modelMACE predictionrisk factor identification

Identifiers

PMID27649220
PMCPMC5036745
OpenAlexW2520547729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.