Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27649218›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Economic Evaluation of Obesity Prevention in Early Childhood: Methods, Limitations and Recommendations.

Nora Döring, Susanne Mayer, Finn Rasmussen, Diana Sonntag

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Methods for the economic evaluation of obesity prevention dietary interventions in children: A systematic review and critical appraisal of the evidence.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Willingness to pay for measures to increase use of active school transport.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  8. Valuing behavioral interventions for obesity reduction: A scoping review of economic models.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nora DöringChild and Adolescent Public Health Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 17177, Sweden. nora.doering@ki.se.
Susanne MayerDepartment of Health Economics, Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria. susanne.mayer@meduniwien.ac.at.
Finn RasmussenChild and Adolescent Public Health Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 17177, Sweden. finn.rasmussen@ki.se.
Diana SonntagMannheim Institute of Public Health, Social Prevention and Medicine (MIPH), Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Mannheim 68167, Germany. mail@diana-sonntag.eu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite methodological advances in the field of economic evaluations of interventions, economic evaluations of obesity prevention programmes in early childhood are seldom conducted. The aim of the present study was to explore existing methods and applications of economic evaluations, examining their limitations and making recommendations for future cost-effectiveness assessments. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, the British National Health Service Economic Evaluation Databases and EconLit. Eligible studies included trial-based or simulation-based cost-effectiveness analyses of obesity prevention programmes targeting preschool children and/or their parents. The quality of included studies was assessed. Of the six studies included, five were intervention studies and one was based on a simulation approach conducted on secondary data. We identified three main conceptual and methodological limitations of their economic evaluations: Insufficient conceptual approach considering the complexity of childhood obesity, inadequate measurement of effects of interventions, and lack of valid instruments to measure child-related quality of life and costs. Despite the need for economic evaluations of obesity prevention programmes in early childhood, only a few studies of varying quality have been conducted. Moreover, due to methodological and conceptual weaknesses, they offer only limited information for policy makers and intervention providers. We elaborate reasons for the limitations of these studies and offer guidance for designing better economic evaluations of early obesity prevention.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth PromotionHumansParentsPediatric ObesityQuality of LifeState Medicinecost effectivenessearly childhoodmethodsobesityprevention

Identifiers

PMID27649218
PMCPMC5036744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.