Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27648973›Full record

ArticleEconomics and human biology2016

Is treatment "intensity" associated with healthier lifestyle choices? An application of the dose response function.

Eleonora Fichera, Richard Emsley, Matt Sutton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Economics and human biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eleonora FicheraManchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom. Electronic address: eleonora.fichera@manchester.ac.uk.
Richard EmsleyCentre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom. Electronic address: richard.emsley@manchester.ac.uk.
Matt SuttonManchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom. Electronic address: matt.sutton@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K021583/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthy lifestyle choices and doctor consultations can be substitutes or complements in the health production function. In this paper we consider the relation between the number of doctor consultations and the frequency of patient physical activity. We use a novel application of the Dose-Response Function model proposed by Hirano and Imbens (2004) to deal with treatment endogeneity under the no unmeasured confounding assumption. Our application takes account of unobserved heterogeneity and uses dynamic non-linear models for the treatment and outcome variables of interest. Using seven waves of the British Household Panel Survey, we find that higher treatment intensity and frequency of physical activity are inversely related. We show that accounting for both treatment selection and unobserved heterogeneity halves the size of this relationship. An additional doctor consultation is associated with a 0.5 percentage point reduction in the probability of undertaking vigorous physical activity. Our results hold for a sub-sample visiting the doctor for health check-ups, and are shown to be robust using instrumental variables.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorExerciseLife StylePhysiciansAdultFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, EconometricModels, StatisticalOffice VisitsProbabilityUnited KingdomDose-response functionHealth behavioursNon-linear dynamic models

Identifiers

PMID27648973
PMCPMC5147729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.