Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27648415›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of public health2016

Are Women of East Kazakhstan Satisfied with the Quality of Maternity Care? Implementing the WHO Tool to Assess the Quality of Hospital Services.

Marzhan Dauletyarova, Yuliya Semenova, Galiya Kaylubaeva, Gulshat Manabaeva, Zayituna Khismetova, Zhansulu Akilzhanova, Akylbek Tussupkaliev, Zhazira Orazgaliyeva

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marzhan DauletyarovaSemey State Medical University, Semey, Kazakhstan.
Yuliya SemenovaSemey State Medical University, Semey, Kazakhstan.
Galiya KaylubaevaSemey State Medical University, Semey, Kazakhstan.
Gulshat ManabaevaSemey State Medical University, Semey, Kazakhstan.
Zayituna KhismetovaSemey State Medical University, Semey, Kazakhstan.
Zhansulu AkilzhanovaSemey State Medical University, Semey, Kazakhstan.
Akylbek TussupkalievMarat Ospanov State Medical University, Marat Ospanov, Kazakhstan.
Zhazira OrazgaliyevaSemey State Medical University, Semey, Kazakhstan.
Semey Medical University · KZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the satisfaction of mothers with the quality of care provided by maternity institutions in East Kazakhstan on the basis of the "Quality of hospital Care for mothers and newborn babies, assessment tool" (WHO, 2009).

methodsThis cross-sectional study took place in 2013 and covered five maternity hospitals in East Kazakhstan (one referral, two urban and two rural). To obtain information, interviews with 872 patients were conducted. The standard tool covered 12 areas ranging from pregnancy to childcare. A score was assigned to each area of care (from 0 to 3). The assessment provided the semi-quantitative data on the quality of hospital care for women and newborns from the perception of mothers.

resultsThe average satisfaction score was 2.48 with a range from 2.2 to 2.7. The mean age of women was 27.4 yr. Forty-two percent were primiparas. Mean birth weight was 3455.4 g. All infants had 'skin to skin' contact with their mothers immediately after birth. Mean number of antenatal visits to family clinics was 8.6. Only 42.1% of the respondents used contraceptives while the rest were not aware of contraception, never applied it and could not distinguish between different methods and devices.

conclusionThe quality of care was substandard in all institutions. To improve the quality of care, WHO technologies in perinatal care could be applied.

Indexed as

KazakhstanMaternal health careQuality of careWHO assessment tool

Identifiers

PMID27648415
PMCPMC5026827
OpenAlexW2462880717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.