Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27648410›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of nephrology2016

Immunofluorescence on paraffin embedded renal biopsies: Experience of a tertiary care center with review of literature.

Geetika Singh, Lavleen Singh, Ranajoy Ghosh, Devajit Nath, Amit Kumar Dinda

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of nephrology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fluorescent Immunohistochemistry.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Geetika SinghGeetika Singh, Lavleen Singh, Ranajoy Ghosh, Devajit Nath, Amit Kumar Dinda, Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Lavleen SinghGeetika Singh, Lavleen Singh, Ranajoy Ghosh, Devajit Nath, Amit Kumar Dinda, Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Ranajoy GhoshGeetika Singh, Lavleen Singh, Ranajoy Ghosh, Devajit Nath, Amit Kumar Dinda, Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Devajit NathGeetika Singh, Lavleen Singh, Ranajoy Ghosh, Devajit Nath, Amit Kumar Dinda, Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Amit Kumar DindaGeetika Singh, Lavleen Singh, Ranajoy Ghosh, Devajit Nath, Amit Kumar Dinda, Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Creative Research Enterprises (United States) · USAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo describe the technique of immunofluorescence on paraffin embedded tissue sections and discuss the potential pitfalls with an in depth review of literature.

methodsImmunofluorescence is integral to diagnostic renal pathology. Immunofluorescence on paraffin embedded renal biopsies (IF-P) after enzyme treatment has been described in literature, however has not found widespread use in renal pathology laboratories. In our laboratory proteinase K digestion of paraffin embedded renal biopsy material was standardized and applied prospectively in cases where immunofluorescence on fresh frozen tissue was non contributory or not possible. Diagnostic utility was assessed and in a cohort of cases comparison of intensity of staining with routine immunofluorescence was performed.

resultsOver the 5-year study period, of the 3141 renal biopsies received IF-P was performed on 246 cases (7.7%) and was interpretable with optimal digestion in 214 cases (6.8%). It was of diagnostic utility in the majority of cases, which predominantly included glomerular disease. Non-diagnostic IF-P was found in membranous nephropathy (2 of 11 cases), membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (2 of 32 cases), lupus nephritis (1 of 25 cases), post infectious glomerulonephritis (1 of 11 cases) and chronic glomerulonephritis (3 of 8 cases). Comparing cases with both routine IF and IF-P, 35 of 37 showed either equal intensity or a minor difference in intensity of staining (1+) for the diagnostic immunoglobulin/complement. Technically assessment of immunofluorescence on the paraffin embedded tissue was found to be easier with clearly observed morphology, however a false positive staining pattern was observed in under-digested tissue.

conclusionAs a "salvage" technique, immunofluorescence on paraffin embedded renal biopsies is of great diagnostic utility, however not without pitfalls.

Indexed as

Enzymatic digestionImmunofluorescence on paraffin sectionProteinase KRenal biopsySalvage technique

Identifiers

PMID27648410
PMCPMC5011253
OpenAlexW2514964721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.