Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27648351›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of cancer research2016

Disrupting P-glycoprotein function in clinical settings: what can we learn from the fundamental aspects of this transporter?

Francisco S Chung, Jayson S Santiago, Miguel Francisco M De Jesus, Camille V Trinidad, Melvin Floyd E See

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. EfficientAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. GABAMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francisco S ChungCellular Therapeutics Center, Makati Medical Center Makati City, Philippines 1229.
Jayson S SantiagoCellular Therapeutics Center, Makati Medical Center Makati City, Philippines 1229.
Miguel Francisco M De JesusCellular Therapeutics Center, Makati Medical Center Makati City, Philippines 1229.
Camille V TrinidadCellular Therapeutics Center, Makati Medical Center Makati City, Philippines 1229.
Melvin Floyd E SeeCellular Therapeutics Center, Makati Medical Center Makati City, Philippines 1229.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

P-glycoprotein is one of the most well-studied drug transporters, significant for its role in cancer multiple drug resistance. However, using P-gp inhibitors with the aim of enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of anti-cancer drugs has led to disappointing outcomes. Furthermore, several lead compounds suggested by in vitro and pre-clinical studies have shown variable pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacies when applied in the clinical setting. This review will highlight the need to revisit a sound approach to better design and apply P-gp inhibitors in light of safety and efficacy. Challenges confronting the issue hinge upon myriad studies that do not necessarily represent the heterogeneous target population of this therapeutic approach. The application of P-gp modulators has also been complicated by the promiscuous substrate-binding behaviour of P-gp, as well as toxicities related to its intrinsic presence in healthy tissue. This review capitalizes on information spanning genetics, energetics, and pharmacology, bringing to light some fundamental aspects that ought to be reconsidered in order to improve upon and design the next generation of P-gp inhibitors.

Indexed as

Cancer therapeuticsdrug resistanceenergeticsP-glycoproteinpharmacokineticstransporter

Identifiers

PMID27648351
PMCPMC5004065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.