Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27648052›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences

Advantages of caudal block over intrarectal local anesthesia plus periprostatic nerve block for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Na Wang, Yaowen Fu, Haichun Ma, Jinguo Wang, Yang Gao

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03859804 (Comparison of Pain Levels in Fusion Prostate Biopsy and Standard TRUS-Guided Biopsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03859804 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Pain Levels in Fusion Prostate Biopsy and Standard TRUS-Guided Biopsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorTC Erciyes UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled252ConditionsPain Due to Certain Specified Procedures, Prostate Cancer, BiopsyArmsStandard transrectal 12 core biopsy, MRI- US fusion prostate biopsy (FPB)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Comparison of pudendal and caudal nerve blocks for transrectal prostate biopsy in patients with anorectal disease A prospective, randomized trial.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparison of pain levels in fusion prostate biopsy and standard TRUS-Guided biopsy.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Na WangNa Wang, Department of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China.
Yaowen FuYaowen Fu, Department of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China.
Haichun MaHaichun Ma, Department of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China.
Jinguo WangJinguo Wang, Department of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China.
Yang GaoYang Gao, Department of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare caudal block with intrarectal local anesthesia plus periprostatic nerve block for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

methodsOne hundred and ninety patients scheduled for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy were randomized equally into Group-A who received caudal block (20 ml 1.2% lidocaine) and Group-B who received intrarectal local anesthesia (0.3% oxybuprocaine cream) plus periprostatic nerve block (10 ml 1% lidocaine plus 0.5% ropivacaine) before biopsy. During and after the procedure, the patients rated the level of pain/discomfort at various time points. Complications during the whole study period and the patient overall satisfaction were also evaluated.

resultsMore pain and discomfort was detected during periprostatic nerve block than during caudal block. Pain and discomfort was significantly lower during prostate biopsy and during the manipulation of the probe in the rectum in Group-A than in Group-B. No significant differences were detected in the pain intensity after biopsy and side effects between the two groups.

conclusionsCaudal block provides better anesthesia than periprostatic nerve block plus intrarectal local anesthesia for TRUS guided prostate biopsy without an increase of side effects.

Indexed as

BiopsyCaudal blockPeriprostatic nerve blockProstateTransrectalUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID27648052
PMCPMC5017115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.