Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27648039›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences

Early outcomes of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Ghulam Hussain, Hammad Azam, Mirza Ahmad Raza Baig, Naseem Ahmad

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04834219 (Effect of Off-Pump and On-Pump Techniques on Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in CABG), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04834219 completednot on this map

Effect of Off-Pump and On-Pump Techniques on Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in CABG

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBozok UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled64ConditionsCerebral Oxygenation, Oxidative Stress, Myocardial InfarctionArmsOn-Pump CABG, Off-Pump CABG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ghulam HussainGhulam Hussain. FCPS Cardiac Surgery. Assistant Professor of Cardiac Surgery, Ch. Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology (CPEIC), Multan, Pakistan.
Hammad AzamHammad Azam. FCPS (Surgery). Assistant Professor of Cardiac Surgery, Sheikh Zayed Medical College and Hospital, Rahim Yaar Khan, Pakistan.
Mirza Ahmad Raza BaigMirza Ahmad Raza Baig. BS in Cardiac Perfusion. Clinical Perfusionist, Ch. Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology (CPEIC), Multan, Pakistan.
Naseem AhmadNaseem Ahmad. FCPS Cardiac Surgery. Assistant Professor of Cardiac Surgery, Ch. Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology (CPEIC), Multan, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo see the early post-operative outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

methodsThis retrospective analytical study was conducted at Ch. Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology Multan, Pakistan. Our Primary outcome variables were; necessity of inotropic support, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ICU stay, nonfatal stroke, new renal failure requiring dialysis and death within 30 days after operation. There were two groups of patients; Group-I (On-pump group) and Group-II (Off-pump Group). SPSS V17 was used for data analysis. Independent sample t-test and Mann Whitney U test were used to compare quantitative Variables. Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to analyze qualitative variables. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsThree hundred patients were included in this study. There were no significant difference regarding risk factors except hyper-cholestrolemia which was high in off pump group (p-value 0.05). Angiographic and Echocardiographic characteristics e.g. preoperative ejection fraction, LV function grade and severity of CAD was same between the groups. Mortality risk scores and Priority status for surgery were also same. Regarding post-operative outcomes; Post-op CKMB Levels, need and duration of inotropic support, mechanical ventilation time and ICU stay was significantly less in Off-Pump group (p-value 0.001, <0.0001, 0.006, 0.025 and 0.001 resp.). Peri-operative chest drainage was significantly high in On-pump CABG group (p-value 0.027). Incidence of post-op complications was not statistically different between the groups.

conclusionsAt 30 days follow-up, Incidence of myocardial infarction, necessity and duration of inotropic support, ICU stay period and peri-operative bleeding were significantly less in off-pump group. The incidence of neurologic, pulmonary and renal complications was same between the off-pump and on-pump groups.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionOff-pump CABGOn-Pump CABG

Identifiers

PMID27648039
PMCPMC5017102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.