ArticleJournal of statistical planning and inference2016
Multiple Imputation in Three or More Stages.
Article in Journal of statistical planning and inference, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two-stage multiple imputation with a longitudinal composite variable.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Maximizing the return on investment in Early Childhood Home Visiting through enhanced eligibility screening.Child abuse & neglect · 2021Article
- Understanding the Influence of Sexual Risk Taking, Ethnic Identity, and Family and Peer Support on School Importance Among Hispanic Adolescents.Education and urban society · 2020Article
- The Cognitive Empowerment Scale: Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis Among Youth of Color.Child & adolescent social work journal : C & A · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Missing values present challenges in the analysis of data across many areas of research. Handling incomplete data incorrectly can lead to bias, over-confident intervals, and inaccurate inferences. One principled method of handling incomplete data is multiple imputation. This article considers incomplete data in which values are missing for three or more qualitatively different reasons and applies a modified multiple imputation framework in the analysis of that data. Included are a proof of the methodology used for three-stage multiple imputation with its limiting distribution, an extension to more than three types of missing values, an extension to the ignorability assumption with proof, and simulations demonstrating that the estimator is unbiased and efficient under the ignorability assumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.