Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27647896›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Focal colors across languages are representative members of color categories.

Joshua T Abbott, Thomas L Griffiths, Terry Regier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The origin of color categories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What Are Group Level Traits and How Do They Evolve?Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Verriest Lecture: Adventures in blue and yellow.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Differential coding of perception in the world's languages.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  19. Color naming across languages reflects color use.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshua T AbbottDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; joshua.abbott@berkeley.edu.
Thomas L GriffithsDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; Cognitive Science Program, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Terry RegierCognitive Science Program, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focal colors, or best examples of color terms, have traditionally been viewed as either the underlying source of cross-language color-naming universals or derived from category boundaries that vary widely across languages. Existing data partially support and partially challenge each of these views. Here, we advance a position that synthesizes aspects of these two traditionally opposed positions and accounts for existing data. We do so by linking this debate to more general principles. We show that best examples of named color categories across 112 languages are well-predicted from category extensions by a statistical model of how representative a sample is of a distribution, independently shown to account for patterns of human inference. This model accounts for both universal tendencies and variation in focal colors across languages. We conclude that categorization in the contested semantic domain of color may be governed by principles that apply more broadly in cognition and that these principles clarify the interplay of universal and language-specific forces in color naming.

Indexed as

Color PerceptionLanguageColorHumansPhotic StimulationSurveys and Questionnairescolor categoriessemantic universalssemantic variation

Identifiers

PMID27647896
PMCPMC5056040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.