Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27647890›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Superflexibility of graphene oxide.

Philippe Poulin, Rouhollah Jalili, Wilfrid Neri, Frédéric Nallet, Thibaut Divoux, Annie Colin, Seyed Hamed Aboutalebi, Gordon Wallace, Cécile Zakri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Lower charge, higher order: Revising electrostatic control of nematic phases in 2D polyelectrolytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Nanobio Interface Between Proteins and 2D Nanomaterials.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. 2D Electrolytes: Theory, Modeling, Synthesis, and Characterization.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Philippe PoulinCentre de Recherche Paul Pascal - CNRS, University of Bordeaux, 33600 Pessac, France.
Rouhollah JaliliAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, Australian Institute of Innovative Materials Facility, Innovation Campus, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Wilfrid NeriCentre de Recherche Paul Pascal - CNRS, University of Bordeaux, 33600 Pessac, France.
Frédéric NalletCentre de Recherche Paul Pascal - CNRS, University of Bordeaux, 33600 Pessac, France.
Thibaut DivouxCentre de Recherche Paul Pascal - CNRS, University of Bordeaux, 33600 Pessac, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6777-5084
Annie ColinCentre de Recherche Paul Pascal - CNRS, University of Bordeaux, 33600 Pessac, France.
Seyed Hamed AboutalebiCondensed Matter National Laboratory, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences, 19395-5531, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-3711-332X
Gordon WallaceAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, Australian Institute of Innovative Materials Facility, Innovation Campus, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Cécile ZakriCentre de Recherche Paul Pascal - CNRS, University of Bordeaux, 33600 Pessac, France; zakri@crpp-bordeaux.cnrs.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO), the main precursor of graphene-based materials made by solution processing, is known to be very stiff. Indeed, it has a Young's modulus comparable to steel, on the order of 300 GPa. Despite its very high stiffness, we show here that GO is superflexible. We quantitatively measure the GO bending rigidity by characterizing the flattening of thermal undulations in response to shear forces in solution. Characterizations are performed by the combination of synchrotron X-ray diffraction at small angles and in situ rheology (rheo-SAXS) experiments using the high X-ray flux of a synchrotron source. The bending modulus is found to be 1 kT, which is about two orders of magnitude lower than the bending rigidity of neat graphene. This superflexibility compares with the fluidity of self-assembled liquid bilayers. This behavior is discussed by considering the mechanisms at play in bending and stretching deformations of atomic monolayers. The superflexibility of GO is a unique feature to develop bendable electronics after reduction, films, coatings, and fibers. This unique combination of properties of GO allows for flexibility in processing and fabrication coupled with a robustness in the fabricated structure.

Indexed as

bending rigiditygraphene oxiderheo-SAXS

Identifiers

PMID27647890
PMCPMC5056031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.