Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27647883›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Support vector machine applied to predict the zoonotic potential of E. coli O157 cattle isolates.

Nadejda Lupolova, Timothy J Dallman, Louise Matthews, James L Bono, David L Gally

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Predicting clinical outcome ofMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Genome Sequence Analysis and Characterization of Shiga Toxin 2 Production byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. The future of zoonotic risk prediction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Pathogenic potential assessment of the Shiga toxin-producingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Quantifying the transmission of antimicrobial resistance at the human and livestock interface with genomics.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Review
  20. The Role ofToxins · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nadejda LupolovaDivision of Immunity and Infection, The Roslin Institute and The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
Timothy J DallmanPublic Health England, National Infection Service, London NW9 5EQ, United Kingdom.
Louise MatthewsInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4420-8367
James L BonoUS Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, NE 68933.ORCID 0000-0001-5146-1171
David L GallyDivision of Immunity and Infection, The Roslin Institute and The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, United Kingdom; dgally@ed.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequence analyses of pathogen genomes facilitate the tracking of disease outbreaks and allow relationships between strains to be reconstructed and virulence factors to be identified. However, these methods are generally used after an outbreak has happened. Here, we show that support vector machine analysis of bovine E. coli O157 isolate sequences can be applied to predict their zoonotic potential, identifying cattle strains more likely to be a serious threat to human health. Notably, only a minor subset (less than 10%) of bovine E. coli O157 isolates analyzed in our datasets were predicted to have the potential to cause human disease; this is despite the fact that the majority are within previously defined pathogenic lineages I or I/II and encode key virulence factors. The predictive capacity was retained when tested across datasets. The major differences between human and bovine E. coli O157 isolates were due to the relative abundances of hundreds of predicted prophage proteins. This finding has profound implications for public health management of disease because interventions in cattle, such a vaccination, can be targeted at herds carrying strains of high zoonotic potential. Machine-learning approaches should be applied broadly to further our understanding of pathogen biology.

Indexed as

Support Vector MachineAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesDisease OutbreaksEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli O157HumansPhylogenyShiga Toxin 2United KingdomZoonosesShiga Toxin 2cattleE. colimachine learningShiga toxinzoonosis

Identifiers

PMID27647883
PMCPMC5056084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.