Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27647730›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology2016

A mosaic world: puzzles revealed by adult neural stem cell heterogeneity.

Zayna Chaker, Paolo Codega, Fiona Doetsch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Isolation of postnatal human neural stem cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hallmarks of stem cell aging.Cell stem cell · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neural stem cell heterogeneity in adult hippocampus.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  16. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zayna ChakerBiozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Paolo CodegaDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Fiona DoetschBiozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. fiona.doetsch@unibas.ch.

Funding

Prospective Purification of Adult Stem Cell AstrocytesR01NS074039 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHELANSKI, MICHAEL L · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS074039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural stem cells (NSCs) reside in specialized niches in the adult mammalian brain. The ventricular-subventricular zone (V-SVZ), adjacent to the lateral ventricles, gives rise to olfactory bulb (OB) neurons, and some astrocytes and oligodendrocytes throughout life. In vitro assays have been widely used to retrospectively identify NSCs. However, cells that behave as stem cells in vitro do not reflect the identity, diversity, and behavior of NSCs in vivo. Novel tools including fluorescence activated cell sorting, lineage-tracing, and clonal analysis have uncovered multiple layers of adult V-SVZ NSC heterogeneity, including proliferation state and regional identity. In light of these findings, we reexamine the concept of adult NSCs, considering heterogeneity as a key parameter for analyzing their dynamics in vivo. V-SVZ NSCs form a mosaic of quiescent (qNSCs) and activated cells (aNSCs) that reside in regionally distinct microdomains, reflecting their regional embryonic origins, and give rise to specific subtypes of OB interneurons. Prospective purification and transcriptome analysis of qNSCs and aNSCs has illuminated their molecular and functional properties. qNSCs are slowly dividing, have slow kinetics of neurogenesis in vivo, can be recruited to regenerate the V-SVZ, and only rarely give rise to in vitro colonies. aNSCs are highly proliferative, undergo rapid clonal expansion of the neurogenic lineage in vivo, and readily form in vitro colonies. Key open questions remain about stem cell dynamics in vivo and the lineage relationship between qNSCs and aNSCs under homeostasis and regeneration, as well as context-dependent plasticity of regionally distinct adult NSCs under different external stimuli. WIREs Dev Biol 2016, 5:640-658. doi: 10.1002/wdev.248 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Indexed as

AdultAdult Stem CellsCell DifferentiationHumansNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisStem Cell Niche

Identifiers

PMID27647730
PMCPMC5113677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.