Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27647671›Full record

Trial reportBipolar disorders2016

fMRI brain activation changes following treatment of a first bipolar manic episode.

Stephen M Strakowski, David E Fleck, Jeffrey Welge, James C Eliassen, Matthew Norris, Michelle Durling, Richard A Komoroski, Wen-Jang Chu, Wade Weber, Jonathan A Dudley and 7 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bipolar disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Changes in the structural brain connectome over the course of a nonrandomized clinical trial for acute mania.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Stephen M StrakowskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. steve.strakowski@austin.utexas.edu.
David E FleckDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jeffrey WelgeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
James C EliassenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Matthew NorrisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Michelle DurlingDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Richard A KomoroskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Wen-Jang ChuDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Wade WeberDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jonathan A DudleyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Thomas J BlomDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Amanda StoverDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Christina KleinDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jeffrey R StrawnDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Melissa P DelBelloDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jing-Huei LeeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Caleb M AdlerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience and Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Funding

U of Cincinnati Bipolar Disorder Imaging & Treatment Research Center (BITREC)P50MH077138 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI STRAKOWSKI, STEPHEN M · 2007 to 2011
$9.6M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH077138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe tested the hypothesis that, with treatment, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) regional brain activation in first-episode mania would normalize - i.e., that differences from healthy subjects would diminish over time, and would be associated with clinical remission status, potentially identifying neuroanatomic treatment response markers.

methodsForty-two participants with bipolar I disorder were recruited during their first manic episode, pseudo-randomized to open-label lithium or quetiapine, and followed for 8 weeks. fMRI scans were obtained at baseline and then after 1 and 8 weeks of treatment, while participants performed a continuous performance task with emotional distracters. Healthy participants received fMRI scans at these same intervals. Specific region-of-interest (ROI) activations within prefrontal emotional networks were assessed as potential measures of treatment response.

resultsROI data were reduced using exploratory factor analysis, which identified five factors that were organizationally consistent with functional anatomic models of human emotion modulation. Half of the participants with bipolar disorder achieved remission by Week 8 and were contrasted with the other half that did not. Analyses demonstrated that, in the bipolar disorder group in general, treatment led to decreases in activation across brain regions toward healthy subject values. However, differences in activation changes were observed between subjects with bipolar disorder who did or did not achieve remission in subcortical and amygdala factors.

conclusionsThese findings provide evidence for potential neuroanatomic treatment response markers in first-episode bipolar disorder.

Indexed as

AmygdalaBipolar DisorderAdultAntimanic AgentsEmotionsEpisode of CareFemaleHumansLithiumMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuetiapine FumarateTask Performance and AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAntimanic AgentsLithiumQuetiapine Fumarateamygdalabipolar disorderfirst-episodefMRImaniaprefrontaltreatment

Identifiers

PMID27647671
PMCPMC5951160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.