ReviewZdravstveno varstvo2016
The Role of the Psychosocial Dimension in the Improvement of Quality of Care: A Systematic Review.
Review in Zdravstveno varstvo, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of BATHE interview technique on patient satisfaction in an ambulatory family medicine centre in South India.Family medicine and community health · 2020Trial
- Advancing life: innovative approaches to enhance survival in sickle cell anemia patients.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Development and validation of the scale for measuring biopsychosocial approach of family physicians to their patients.Family medicine and community health · 2022Article
- Sexual Health and Women Living With Spinal Cord Injury: The Unheard Voice.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Review
- Analysis of Real-World Implementation of the Biopsychosocial Approach to Healthcare: Evidence From a Combination of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- What do we know about patient-provider interactions in sub-Saharan Africa? a scoping review.The Pan African medical journal · 2020Article
- Which positive factors give general practitioners job satisfaction and make general practice a rewarding career? A European multicentric qualitative research by the European general practice research network.BMC family practice · 2019Article
- Early Identification of Patients in Need of Palliative Care in Slovenian General Practice.Zdravstveno varstvo · 2018Article
- The development and validation of a new interprofessional team approach evaluation scale.PloS one · 2018Article
- Variations in patient safety climate and perceived quality of collaboration between professions in out-of-hours care.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of our systematic review was to analyse the published literature on the psychosocial dimension of care in family medicine and its relationship with quality of care. We wanted to find out whether there is any evidence on the psychosocial approach in (family) medicine. The recommended bio-psycho-social approach, besides the biomedical model of illness, takes into account several co-influencing psychological, sociological and existential factors. An online search of nine different databases used Boolean operators and the following selection criteria: the paper contained information on the holistic approach, quality indicators, family medicine, patient-centred care and/or the bio-psycho-social model of treatment. We retrieved 743 papers, of which 36 fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Including the psychosocial dimension in patient management has been found to be useful in the prevention and treatment of physical and psychiatric illness, resulting in improved social functioning and patient satisfaction, reduced health care disparities, and reduced annual medical care charges. The themes of patient-centred, behavioural or psychosocial medicine were quite well presented in several papers. We could not find any conclusive evidence of the impact of a holistic bio-psycho-social-approach. Weak and variable definitions of psychosocial dimensions, a low number of well-designed intervention studies, and low numbers of included patients limited our conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.