ArticleUpsala journal of medical sciences2016
Using the Reproductive Life Plan in contraceptive counselling.
Article in Upsala journal of medical sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- What do people know about fertility? A systematic review on fertility awareness and its associated factors.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2018Pooled it
- An intervention in contraceptive counseling increased the knowledge about fertility and awareness of preconception health-a randomized controlled trial.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2019Trial
- Can Reproductive Life Plan-based counselling increase men's fertility awareness?Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2018Trial
- A Mixed-Methods Examination of Fertility Desires and Reproductive Planning Among Low-Income Black Fathers.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- What does family building mean? A qualitative exploration and a new definition: a UK-based study.Reproductive health · 2022Article
- Parenthood aspirations and understanding of factors that affect the chance of achieving them: A population survey.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2022Article
- Leveraging the Client-Provider Interaction to Address Contraceptive Discontinuation: A Scoping Review of the Evidence That Links Them.Global health, science and practice · 2021Article
- Knowledge about the impact of age on fertility: a brief review.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2020Review
- Exploring preconception health beliefs amongst adults of childbearing age in the UK: a qualitative analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Article
- Development of an evidence-based website on preconception health.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2018Article
- Investigating Reproductive Life Plan in Pregnant Women Referred to Teaching Hospitals of Mashhad, Iran.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
- Participants' perceptions of the preconception phase of theWomen's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Having children or not is one of the most important decisions that a person will make in his or her lifetime. The Reproductive Life Plan (RLP) is a protocol that aims to encourage both women and men to reflect on their reproductive intentions and to find strategies for successful family planning, for example to have the wanted number of children and to avoid unwanted pregnancies as well as ill-health that may threaten reproduction. The RLP was developed in an American context for promotion of reproductive health in a life cycle perspective. Few studies have systematically evaluated the effectiveness of using an RLP protocol in clinical practice. This article describes the application of using the RLP protocol in contraceptive counselling in Sweden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.