ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2016
[Intraoperative 3D imaging : Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic benefits].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modified 3D-Controlled Inside-Out Compression Screw Fixation Technique in Posterior Malleolar Fractures: A Narrative Review and Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comparison of the Effective Radiation Dose in the Region of the Facial Skull Between Multidetector CT, Dental Conebeam CT and Intraoperative 3D C-Arms.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2024Article
- [Innovative 3D imaging].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Intraoperative revision rates due to three-dimensional imaging in orthopedic trauma surgery: results of a case series of 4721 patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Article
- Comparison of intraoperative 2D vs. 3D imaging in open reduction and fixation of distal radius fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020Article
- [Hybrid operating room : Application in trauma surgery and orthopaedics].Der Unfallchirurg · 2020Article
- A review of existing and potential computer user interfaces for modern radiology.Insights into imaging · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraoperative 3D imaging has a marked impact on the surgical treatment of articular fractures. In theory, insufficient reduction of fracture fragments and malpositioning of implants can be corrected in the same session so that unnecessary secondary imaging and revision surgery can be avoided. Current evidence on the accuracy of 3D scans, however, relies on heterogeneous preclinical data and must be interpreted with caution. Every fourth 3D scan seems to lead to a repositioning of fracture fragments or implants, despite unproven sensitivity and specificity. The interaction between diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic consequences needs exploration before any conclusions on the (additional) benefits of intraoperative 3D imaging can be drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27646699What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.