Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27646684›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Temporal Development of Gut Microbiota in Triclocarban Exposed Pregnant and Neonatal Rats.

Rebekah C Kennedy, Russell R Fling, Michael S Robeson, Arnold M Saxton, Robert L Donnell, John L Darcy, David A Bemis, Jiang Liu, Ling Zhao, Jiangang Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Different Facets of Triclocarban: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Temporal dynamics of gut microbiota in triclocarban-exposed weaned rats.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebekah C KennedyDepartment of Public Health, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Russell R FlingDepartment of Microbiology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Michael S RobesonDepartment of Fish, Wildlife &Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Arnold M SaxtonDepartment of Animal Science, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Robert L DonnellDepartment of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
John L DarcyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
David A BemisDepartment of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Jiang LiuDepartment of Microbiology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Ling ZhaoDepartment of Nutrition, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Jiangang ChenDepartment of Public Health, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · USColorado State University · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

In utero and neonatal effects of triclocarban exposureR21ES017475 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI CHEN, JIANGANG · 2010 to 2011
$423k
NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES017475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alteration of gut microbial colonization process may influence susceptibility of the newborn/infant to infectious and chronic disease. Infectious disease risk leads to widespread use of non-prescription antimicrobials in household products such as Triclocarban (TCC), an antimicrobial compound in personal care products. TCC concentrates in and is transferred through the milk to suckling offspring. TCC exposure during gestation and lactation significantly reduced phylogenetic diversity (PD) among exposed dams and neonates. Among dams using weighted UniFrac distances, TCC induced significant dysbiosis of gut microbiota by gestational day (GD) 18, a trend that continued after delivery. Similarly, an overall restructuring of gut microbiota occurred in neonates. By postnatal day (PND) 12, communities separated based on exposure status and became significantly different at PND 16. The ability of TCC to drive microbial dysbiosis warrants future investigation to evaluate the safety of non-prescription antimicrobial use, including TCC, during critical exposure windows.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMaternal ExposurePrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBiodiversityCarbanilidesFecesFemaleGestational AgeLactationPregnancyRatsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCarbanilidestriclocarban

Identifiers

PMID27646684
PMCPMC5028839
OpenAlexW2523123812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.